shape
carat
color
clarity

Please share opinions on these EC diamonds

Eland

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
11
I only have the photo images of these stones and would like your feedback. These are all GIA certified stones.

1.0ct K VS2 66.4/64.0 Depth/Table
7827910_1.jpg

1.41ct K VS2 69.3/70.0 Depth/Table
7821873_1.jpg

1.52ct K SI1 67.2/65.0 Depth/Table
7776925_1.jpg

1.27 K VS2 67.6/68.0 Depth/Table
7470408_1.jpg
 

diamondseeker2006

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
58,547
#2 looks great to me, but I prefer tables under 65, personally. You will have a very large table on that stone, but the faceting looks very nice.

#1 may or may not be okay. Would need more pictures and ASETs would be nice on all. #3 is not clean enough. I wouldn't look at SI1 in an emerald cut. #4 is a maybe but need more images.

One bit of info you should always include when comparing stones is the diameter measurements. Size matters with emerald cuts because of their depth.
 

Mayk

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 12, 2011
Messages
4,772
I also like the look of #2. Nice steps. I also like the ratio. It looks like its around 1.25. I like it better than long and skinny or more rectangle in shape.
 

Rockinruby

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
2,740
I like # 2 as well. I would be curious to see more pics info on # 4. I would pass on #3. :wavey:
 

lambskin

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
3,053
2
 

Eland

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
11
Thanks for the input. I was drawn to #2 and #4. I will see if I can get ASETS. In the meantime I am still looking for a suitable stone.
 

Lookinagain

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
4,428
I vote for #2 as well.
 

Gypsy

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
40,225
I like #2 and #3 but there is no way 3 is clean.
 
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top