I input the specs of each diamond (both 2 carat D colour SI1) into the HCA and got scores of 1.3 and 1.6 which are both great.
I've decided to call the 1.3 the "Average-Sized All-Rounder" - she is 8.06mm with a depth of 61.7% and crown angle of 34.5, pavilion 40.8
The 1.6 is "The Very Big but Slightly Shallow" - she is 8.2mm but depth of 58.8% and crown angle of just 32.3, pavilion of 40.1
Both are SI1, nothing visible to naked eye, about equal in terms of placement of inclusions.
The names I've given each diamond capture the pros and cons. I have large fingers (size 7.5) so the bigger the better. But I really really love a bright, crisp sparkle under all lights, and I'm worried Very Big but Slightly Shallow won't deliver as much as Average-Sized All-Rounder. Any opinions are welcome. Thanks so much!
I've decided to call the 1.3 the "Average-Sized All-Rounder" - she is 8.06mm with a depth of 61.7% and crown angle of 34.5, pavilion 40.8
The 1.6 is "The Very Big but Slightly Shallow" - she is 8.2mm but depth of 58.8% and crown angle of just 32.3, pavilion of 40.1
Both are SI1, nothing visible to naked eye, about equal in terms of placement of inclusions.
The names I've given each diamond capture the pros and cons. I have large fingers (size 7.5) so the bigger the better. But I really really love a bright, crisp sparkle under all lights, and I'm worried Very Big but Slightly Shallow won't deliver as much as Average-Sized All-Rounder. Any opinions are welcome. Thanks so much!