exactlyDate: 4/2/2007 5:25:45 PM
Author: BAreEhD
I''m not sure I fully understand, Gary. Are you saying that it looks like it has potential, but the ASET will give a better indication?
I''m not sure I would call the symmetry sucky...but rather not as good as some stones we see around here. I''m sure there are stones with much worse symmetry out there.Date: 4/3/2007 3:51:25 PM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
Symmetry sucks, but light return is very good.
It will sparkle nicely
Date: 4/4/2007 10:53:52 AM
Author: Rockingout
I would pass on this diamond. One of the pavilions is so fat or at a shallow angle that it is leaking light pretty bad. See the right side with the white areas in the ideal scope and the black areas in the top side of the diamond in the aset (obviously the diamond has been rotated counter clockwise from the idealscope to the aset picture). This leakage will only increase when the diamond is tilted. Plus it looks like it has 4 chevrons which will produce tiny tiny flashes of fire. I like my fire big and bold as one would see in a 2 chevron princess. See avatar
Rockingout it is quite easy to see this stone has 3 chevrons and I would think that is about right for a 1 1/4ct stone.Date: 4/4/2007 10:53:52 AM
Author: Rockingout
I would pass on this diamond. One of the pavilions is so fat or at a shallow angle that it is leaking light pretty bad. See the right side with the white areas in the ideal scope and the black areas in the top side of the diamond in the aset (obviously the diamond has been rotated counter clockwise from the idealscope to the aset picture). This leakage will only increase when the diamond is tilted. Plus it looks like it has 4 chevrons which will produce tiny tiny flashes of fire. I like my fire big and bold as one would see in a 2 chevron princess. See avatar
Same thing.Date: 4/4/2007 6:59:45 PM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
not sure what Ketchup is though?