- Joined
- Aug 16, 2007
- Messages
- 5,703
Hera|1411329224|3754886 said:The table is too big for my liking (thought the facet pattern is pretty) and the extremely thin girdle would concern me for durability. I suggest to keep looking.
umbrella|1411340159|3754968 said:I've already had that stone evaluated by a JA gemologist and it was not good. The performance lacks somewhat, which is proven by the ASET. I had 2 other diamonds (which also weren't that great) evaluated at the same time, and this one was the worst of the three. Here's what the gemologist said:
The 0.88 carat-K-SI1 (diamond 362879; $1,970) is a very beautiful option; however, there are more dark areas than brilliance in the diamond; causing it to be the weakest of the three face up. Both "K" color diamonds have a noticeable warmth to them; while all three diamonds are completely "eye clean".
Here's the ASET
I know it seems a great price for a diamond that size, but I would honestly keep looking. I tried to make myself love this diamond because of the price point, but I just couldn't do it. I know it won't be a lively stone. You also mentioned that you're hoping it will be chunky, but I can tell you now that it won't be. This is a transitional cut, and the facets are quite slim for an old cut, so unfortunately it will not be as chunky as other OECs. I suggest your friend's boyfriend keep searching for a bit until a better diamond comes up. That might mean either upping the budget or lowering diamond size, but unfortunately that's the reality of diamond prices.
umbrella|1411342430|3754975 said:Sure if you have the luxury of doing that in person without any fees and if that's what the boyfriend wants to do, then go ahead. It sort of seems pointless to go through a gemologist and get their professional evaluation if you're going to ignore them and have it shipped regardless. I doubt it will be an impressive diamond but as I said, go right ahead if it helps make a decision You never know, it might strike a soft spot with the boyfriend.
woofmama|1411342373|3754974 said:Would your friend consider an antique ring? There's one listed on LT which was originally purchased from JBEG before they split into two separate companies. .79ct HVS2 OEC in platinum with sidestones with a report from David Atlas. Great price $3.1k.
This was my friends ring, she isn't on PS. I have seen it IRL and it's gorgeous.
Link: http://jewelsbyericagrace.smugmug.com/Jewelry/Rings-Antique-Vintage/79ct-Old-European-Cut-Diamond/25067850_9kpML8#!i=2054212012&k=KQsrPBQ
Link: http://www.loupetroop.com/listings/rings-natural-diamond-center/dot-79-oec-g-h-vs2-antique-platinum-engagement-ring-from-jbeg
Asscherhalo_lover|1411342924|3754977 said:My concern for the gemologist is the girdle for setting in a prong setting. I don't see how that's pointless since if they say it's not safe for the setting in mind we wouldn't bother having it shipped. As it stands, JA has free shipping and free returns so I don't think it'll cost anything out of pocket to evaluate the stone in person if that's what is chosen.
Asscherhalo_lover|1411345556|3754992 said:http://www.jamesallen.com/engagemen...n-row-pave-diamond-engagement-ring-item-49486
This is the setting we like best. If this diamond is a dud it'll be the best modern rb we can get for the budget and I'll be back then, lol. This diamond was really just a shot in the dark at something potentially cool and different.
Niel|1411346323|3754997 said:Asscherhalo_lover|1411345556|3754992 said:http://www.jamesallen.com/engagemen...n-row-pave-diamond-engagement-ring-item-49486
This is the setting we like best. If this diamond is a dud it'll be the best modern rb we can get for the budget and I'll be back then, lol. This diamond was really just a shot in the dark at something potentially cool and different.
did this one hae too small of side stones? I ask only because its cheaper, and they add millgraining for free (last i checked)
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/pave/14k-white-gold-tailored-diamond-engagement-ring-item-41042
both lovely, i just ask because its cheaper and the side stones are a tad smaller, making the color difference and cut difference less noticeable.
But i do love that setting too, just an idea
So you are ordering the old cut? I will say (i forget his name at) Old world Diamonds said that ASETS ans Idealscopes arent the best for old cuts.
arkieb1|1411346487|3754999 said:That is a really pretty setting and a great price as well!!!! Out of curiosity will they take a stone from another vendor and set it into that setting for you? We could help you find a nice OEC from somewhere else it put into it or a round brilliant from either JA or somewhere else to go into it.
Asscherhalo_lover|1411346857|3755003 said:Niel|1411346323|3754997 said:Asscherhalo_lover|1411345556|3754992 said:http://www.jamesallen.com/engagemen...n-row-pave-diamond-engagement-ring-item-49486
This is the setting we like best. If this diamond is a dud it'll be the best modern rb we can get for the budget and I'll be back then, lol. This diamond was really just a shot in the dark at something potentially cool and different.
did this one hae too small of side stones? I ask only because its cheaper, and they add millgraining for free (last i checked)
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/pave/14k-white-gold-tailored-diamond-engagement-ring-item-41042
both lovely, i just ask because its cheaper and the side stones are a tad smaller, making the color difference and cut difference less noticeable.
But i do love that setting too, just an idea
So you are ordering the old cut? I will say (i forget his name at) Old world Diamonds said that ASETS ans Idealscopes arent the best for old cuts.
I have seen that smaller version but I think for an extra $200 the other one had much more presence. That's how I feel about old cut re: ASET, I have an OMB and OEC studs which I love in person and would probably be disgusting in an ASET, lol.
I'm waiting to see what the gemologist says about the setting risk regarding the girdle. If they say it's reasonably safe then we'll have it shipped loose to check it out in person.
Niel|1411347074|3755005 said:Asscherhalo_lover|1411346857|3755003 said:Niel|1411346323|3754997 said:Asscherhalo_lover|1411345556|3754992 said:http://www.jamesallen.com/engagemen...n-row-pave-diamond-engagement-ring-item-49486
This is the setting we like best. If this diamond is a dud it'll be the best modern rb we can get for the budget and I'll be back then, lol. This diamond was really just a shot in the dark at something potentially cool and different.
did this one hae too small of side stones? I ask only because its cheaper, and they add millgraining for free (last i checked)
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/pave/14k-white-gold-tailored-diamond-engagement-ring-item-41042
both lovely, i just ask because its cheaper and the side stones are a tad smaller, making the color difference and cut difference less noticeable.
But i do love that setting too, just an idea
So you are ordering the old cut? I will say (i forget his name at) Old world Diamonds said that ASETS ans Idealscopes arent the best for old cuts.
I have seen that smaller version but I think for an extra $200 the other one had much more presence. That's how I feel about old cut re: ASET, I have an OMB and OEC studs which I love in person and would probably be disgusting in an ASET, lol.
I'm waiting to see what the gemologist says about the setting risk regarding the girdle. If they say it's reasonably safe then we'll have it shipped loose to check it out in person.
understandable. I just wanted to voice my concern that the side stones are pretty big and the K color. But if youre not concerned then I'll shut up.