Need Second Opinion on Cloud Inclusion

[Coconutpalm]

Hello Pricescope,

I have recently narrowed down to 3 that I like, I could use some help narrowing it down further just in case I missed something.

1. This first one I really like the numbers and color but I am worry about the many cloud inclusions in the center of the table. I noticed it is not as sharp or crisp, is this something to worry about if not magnified?
https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-di...g-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-2569938

2.https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-di...h-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-3038871

3.Largest stone but with lowest color. The numbers and ideal scope looked the best to me
https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-di...rat-i-color-vs2-clarity-ideal-cut-sku-3151835

 

[Dancing Fire]

2.https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-di...h-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-3038871

Interesting proportion ... small table + a high crown... If this stone is eye clean I'd go for it!

 

[Coconutpalm]

Interesting proportion ... small table + a high crown... If this stone is eye clean I'd go for it!

Yea, I wasn't too sure about the table and crown on that one since most of the super-deals were in the 55-56 table and 15 crown range. From your take they'll add onto the fire?

 

[valeria101]

.
I wouldn't quibble with the smudge in the G, but the H is more interesting !

You could say that the high crown contributes to 'fire' (long story); then, there is simply more diamond to see above the girdle - a nice detail .-)

Voting like @Dancing Fire

 

[Coconutpalm]

Thank you Dancing Fire and valeria101 for your inputs.

I never thought my second choice would get all the attention but I am glad since maximum fire and scintillation is what I'm looking for.

Update: Just received a great idealscope for #1

 

[Dancing Fire]

Yea, I wasn't too sure about the table and crown on that one since most of the super-deals were in the 55-56 table and 15 crown range. From your take they'll add onto the fire?

Yes, IMO.... if you prefer more fire.

 

[Karl_K]

When it comes to knowing if inclusions are going to cause issues, nothing beats a human looking at it.
Over the years I have seen stones with a lot of inclusions in photos/video that were totally eye clean to even those with great vision and no scatter issues.
On the other hand I have seen ones that looked pretty clean in photos/video that the inclusions stood out like a sore thumb in person.

 

[Coconutpalm]

Thanks Karl for your input.

I have contacted JA to see the stones at their showroom but still waiting for them to get back to me. Hopefully that will help narrow things down, but so far it seems like two votes for #2 any others?