1.02 is very square. 1.05 is still considered square.Date: 1/13/2009 2:57:05 PM
Author:LAD
Which should be the bigger percentage the table or the depth? Is a ratio of 1.02 still pretty square? Thanks
Correction: As tables get smaller, depth gets bigger IF crown angle does not change and IF pavilion depth and girdle thickness does not change.Date: 1/13/2009 4:55:18 PM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
1.02 is very square. 1.05 is still considered square.Date: 1/13/2009 2:57:05 PM
Author:LAD
Which should be the bigger percentage the table or the depth? Is a ratio of 1.02 still pretty square? Thanks
Iin general smaller tables are better. As tables get smaller depth gets bigger, so smaller table and bigger depth is more likely to yeild a nice stone, but aSET pictures of stones are the only thing we can help you with
If that''s not possible, shoot for an AGS0 graded diamond. That will help ensure you get a decent stone.Date: 1/13/2009 4:55:18 PM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
1.02 is very square. 1.05 is still considered square.Date: 1/13/2009 2:57:05 PM
Author:LAD
Which should be the bigger percentage the table or the depth? Is a ratio of 1.02 still pretty square? Thanks
Iin general smaller tables are better. As tables get smaller depth gets bigger, so smaller table and bigger depth is more likely to yeild a nice stone, but aSET pictures of stones are the only thing we can help you with