I''ve been looking at princess cuts for a few months now, and I think I''ve finally settled on one. Does this one look good?
1.43 E VS2
6.48 x 6.36 x 4.35mm
Depth: 68.4%
Table: 72%
Girdle: slightly thick
Culet: none
Main inclusion is a feather near one edge, barely visible with a loupe
$9800
I don''t have a sarin report, but the crown height is probably around 8% just from looking at it. I know that many people recommend a crown height of 10-15%, but I looked at this stone next to an H that was supposedly an ideal princess cut (68% table, 70% depth, 11% crown) and I actually thought that one looked a little "chunky", and my lower-crowned E actually looked even more brilliant to me. It really looked amazing to me--of 7 very similar stones I looked at back-to-back (all with tables/depths 68-73), this one was just so much brighter and more beautiful.
Should I go for it?
-gemnovice
1.43 E VS2
6.48 x 6.36 x 4.35mm
Depth: 68.4%
Table: 72%
Girdle: slightly thick
Culet: none
Main inclusion is a feather near one edge, barely visible with a loupe
$9800
I don''t have a sarin report, but the crown height is probably around 8% just from looking at it. I know that many people recommend a crown height of 10-15%, but I looked at this stone next to an H that was supposedly an ideal princess cut (68% table, 70% depth, 11% crown) and I actually thought that one looked a little "chunky", and my lower-crowned E actually looked even more brilliant to me. It really looked amazing to me--of 7 very similar stones I looked at back-to-back (all with tables/depths 68-73), this one was just so much brighter and more beautiful.
Should I go for it?
-gemnovice

