I'm so sorry, but the angles on this diamond are not good at all. It will tend to get grey and look loveless. Its going to be pretty leaky. The price reflects that lack of performance. Not a diamond we would recommend around here. We use GIA Excellent as a starting point, but its pretty wide including some amazing stone and some rather not amazing ones.
These are measurements to help you stay in ideal cut territory with a GIA excellent cut stone.
table: 52-57.5
depth: 60-62.3 {consider 59.5)
crown angle: 34-35.0 (up to 35.5 crown angle can sometimes work with a 40.6 pav angle)
pavilion angle: 40.6-40.9 (sometimes 41.0 if the crown angle is close to 34)
Then, run those four numbers through the HCA tool and reject anything greater than 2.0 (1.0 not better than 1.9, this is used to simply reject stones). Anything left, that meets your clarity and color needs is worthy of requesting images IS/ASET.
Here are a few options assuming a max of $8000 for the diamond.
https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-di...g-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-4268912
https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-di...f-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-4270766
https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-di...g-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-3589561 {lists additional clouds so needs to be reviewed by the JA gemologist for any impact on light return}
You would need to request an idealscope image (IS) that you can post here. That will tell you the volume of light return.
Example
![]()
Don't look good...flat crown + deep bottom =