shape
carat
color
clarity

How would you incorporate french cuts in this setting?

Hi, Yes I now own that setting and I am kicking myself because when I saw the Nicole Ritchie ring I knew it would look amazing with a smaller round in it. I put a coloured stone cushion into it which had to be recut a couple of times and is substantially smaller than the original stone that came out of it and I still think it would look better with a round stone. It would have more of an airline gap that is all. It's a stunning setting in real life.
 
arkieb1|1423972790|3832794 said:
If **edited by moderator, please read our policies**


Hi Arkie!

I had no idea you bought my old setting! :) Glad to know she went to a good home and to a fellow PSer!
 
Resonance.Of.Life|1423989691|3832873 said:
arkieb1|1423972790|3832794 said:
If **edited by moderator, please read our policies**.


Hi Arkie!

I had no idea you bought my old setting! :) Glad to know she went to a good home and to a fellow PSer!

It's an amazing setting. I make the observation that it is the type of ring that looks better on a size 5.50+ or larger finger than yours - the problem you may have had with it, I think was that it was literally too big for your petite fingers, rather than it being the type of ring that actually gets caught on things (its bezel set and not a particularly catchy type ring).... Generally it's a stunning ring. :D
 
diamondseeker2006|1423886414|3832279 said:
Sorry, I posted that first one above by mistake! I know you want a halo.
emeralddecoring.jpg

wow DS - this is sooo gorgeous - would you have any more deets/info/pics on this particular design? thx!
 
arkieb1|1424008606|3832923 said:
Resonance.Of.Life|1423989691|3832873 said:
arkieb1|1423972790|3832794 said:
If **edited by moderator, please read our policies**.


Hi Arkie!

I had no idea you bought my old setting! :) Glad to know she went to a good home and to a fellow PSer!

It's an amazing setting. I make the observation that it is the type of ring that looks better on a size 5.50+ or larger finger than yours - the problem you may have had with it, I think was that it was literally too big for your petite fingers, rather than it being the type of ring that actually gets caught on things (its bezel set and not a particularly catchy type ring).... Generally it's a stunning ring. :D


I loved it dearly, but I think you are right, my tiny hands could not pull it off. :) Mind posting pictures in a new thread?? (sorry for threadjacking, OP).
 
Resonance.Of.Life|1424047809|3833169 said:
arkieb1|1424008606|3832923 said:
Resonance.Of.Life|1423989691|3832873 said:
arkieb1|1423972790|3832794 said:
I **edited by moderator, please read our policies**.


Hi Arkie!

I had no idea you bought my old setting! :) Glad to know she went to a good home and to a fellow PSer!

It's an amazing setting. I make the observation that it is the type of ring that looks better on a size 5.50+ or larger finger than yours - the problem you may have had with it, I think was that it was literally too big for your petite fingers, rather than it being the type of ring that actually gets caught on things (its bezel set and not a particularly catchy type ring).... Generally it's a stunning ring. :D


I loved it dearly, but I think you are right, my tiny hands could not pull it off. :) Mind posting pictures in a new thread?? (sorry for threadjacking, OP).

I don't mind, I'd like to see it too!
 
I haven't posted it because I still haven't figured out what I am going to do with it. Leave it as is now or send it back to Grace.... Once I do I will post pics. :lol:
 
A reminder that we don't allow sales on PS off of preloved. PLease keep any discussion there.
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top