Help with idealscopes to find best performer

[funketrade]

I've come down to these 3 stones and am hoping for your help in identifying the best performer based on idealscope images. They are all either BG signature or WH A Cut Above/Expert Selection, so I expect the differences to be minimal but any help you can offer is greatly apprceciated. Thanks!!

 

[JulieN]

1 or 3.

 

[funketrade]

Thanks JulieN - would you not go for 2 due to the lesser contrast? Or is it something else?

 

[bunnycat]

Thanks JulieN - would you not go for 2 due to the lesser contrast? Or is it something else?

I would say 1 or 3 also. The second one seems to have more areas of white (leakage) under the table. Is the stone deep?

 

[JulieN]

It leaks quite a bit. If I wanted low contrast, I'd find something low contrast that didn't leak.

 

[funketrade]

stone 2 has the following dimensions:
Depth % 62.4
Table % 56.0
Crown Angle 35.6
Star 52.0
Pavilion Angle 40.9
Crown % 15.7
Lower Girdle % 80.0
Measurements 6.15x6.19x3.85

are stones 1 and 3 essentially equivalent or is 1 a bit ahead in terms of light leakage?

 

[JulieN]

They are very similar. At this point, go with which you prefer the settings, or prefer to do business.