Hi could you help me with a diamond? Do you see anything wrong with the certificate? Anything i should be aware of? Here is the Ags, i’m trying to upgrade my diamond with a bigger one and looking forward to advice.
Help me with a diamond please
- Thread starter Caglapek
- Start date
Tahn
Thank you, do you think I'd be able to see the clouds etc with my naked eye- not likely right? This is my stone (that I'd like to upgrade) as a comparison- is there anyway to understand which is a better performing diamond?
Thank you, do you think I'd be able to see the clouds etc with my naked eye- not likely right? This is my stone (that I'd like to upgrade) as a comparison- is there anyway to understand which is a better performing diamond?
Attachments
Hi new one has videos but old one doesn't
Diamond | 1.985 ct I VS2 A CUT ABOVE® Hearts and Arrows Super Ideal Round Cut Loose Diamond AGS Certified | 4391574
This Whiteflash A CUT ABOVE® super ideal cut hearts and arrows 1.985 carat I color VS2 clarity loose diamond is graded by the American Gem Society (AGS) Laboratories. | 4391574
www.whiteflash.com
Diamond | 1.505 ct J SI1 A CUT ABOVE® Hearts and Arrows Super Ideal Round Cut Loose Diamond AGS Certified | 2938307
This Whiteflash A CUT ABOVE® super ideal cut hearts and arrows 1.505 carat J color SI1 clarity loose diamond is graded by the American Gem Society (AGS) Laboratories. | 2938307
www.whiteflash.com
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2018
- Messages
- 5,791
Thanks for sharing the links.
Wow, that 1.985 is very clean. Even in the magnified videos I had a tough time finding all the inclusions. Zoom back to normal levels with the naked eye and there is no doubt it will be eye clean. I really like how crisp & clear the stone looks in the video. Also, you can see the stone is full of zest & fire in both the sparkle & brilliance videos.
Hands down, I think the 1.985 is an excellent choice & would have no hesitations with upgrading.
I had noticed some very minor variances in proportions. For instance, the old stone had an ever so slightly smaller table, barely shorter LGF's, shorter stars, slightly higher crown height and a slightly shallower pavilion. Also, when comparing the hearts image I noticed the 1.985 appears to be cut a little more tightly than your old stone.
https://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/compare/?idnos=4391574,2938307
So I was really curious how the old & new videos might compare to one another. You won't see any drastic differences, but there may be some small personality changes. Ones you may even prefer. For instance, the longer 77 LGF's help provide a more balanced performance in both soft & bright lighting as opposed to 76's who ever so slightly favor indirect/soft lighting. In fact, many say 77 is the perfect balance. It's these type of nuances we are talking about.
Or you may not notice anything and think I'm crazy. That's cool too. One thing is certain, the 1.985 is a phenomenal stone so you'd be crazy to not think it's absolutely stunning!
Wishing you well on your upgrade! Please post pics of the completed ring.
Wow, that 1.985 is very clean. Even in the magnified videos I had a tough time finding all the inclusions. Zoom back to normal levels with the naked eye and there is no doubt it will be eye clean. I really like how crisp & clear the stone looks in the video. Also, you can see the stone is full of zest & fire in both the sparkle & brilliance videos.
Hands down, I think the 1.985 is an excellent choice & would have no hesitations with upgrading.
I had noticed some very minor variances in proportions. For instance, the old stone had an ever so slightly smaller table, barely shorter LGF's, shorter stars, slightly higher crown height and a slightly shallower pavilion. Also, when comparing the hearts image I noticed the 1.985 appears to be cut a little more tightly than your old stone.
https://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/compare/?idnos=4391574,2938307
So I was really curious how the old & new videos might compare to one another. You won't see any drastic differences, but there may be some small personality changes. Ones you may even prefer. For instance, the longer 77 LGF's help provide a more balanced performance in both soft & bright lighting as opposed to 76's who ever so slightly favor indirect/soft lighting. In fact, many say 77 is the perfect balance. It's these type of nuances we are talking about.
Or you may not notice anything and think I'm crazy. That's cool too. One thing is certain, the 1.985 is a phenomenal stone so you'd be crazy to not think it's absolutely stunning!
Wishing you well on your upgrade! Please post pics of the completed ring.
Thank you so much for writing such detail and really looking into it! Now I feel much better about it! You are definitely right about 76 which favors indirect/soft lighting which is bothering me a little bit when I'm outside so I might like it better in bright lighting outside. How about the additional pinpoints are not shown - this is not something to worry about I bet. Thank you so much for your kind words, I'll post a pic soon hopefully.
Hi I have the ring I like it but now there is another stone: When you have a little bit of time can you please take a look at this one as well, Size seems to be very close if the proportions are better I might as well exchange with this one.
Diamond | 1.948 ct I VS2 A CUT ABOVE® Hearts and Arrows Super Ideal Round Cut Loose Diamond AGS Certified | 3980389
This Whiteflash A CUT ABOVE® super ideal cut hearts and arrows 1.948 carat I color VS2 clarity loose diamond is graded by the American Gem Society (AGS) Laboratories. | 3980389
www.whiteflash.com
Hi can you please compare the two:
Diamond comparison | Compare Diamonds to choose and buy the best one
Whiteflash gives you an excellent opportunity to compare diamonds to make a great deal. With diamond’s parameters provided, you can compare any detail.
www.whiteflash.com
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 33,852
I'll take the 1.94ct. Love the high crown on a small table...
That just me.
300x240.png)