Help! Do you like this ring?

[melpla]

I am having a PS vendor make a diamond wedding band for me. I initially sent him this picture to go by, because it was the only one I found in my price range (see image below). But, do you like it? I like the style of this one from Signed Pieces here. How different do you think these two rings will be?

Here''s the one I''d like opinions on. The photos don''t tell you a whole lot:

 

[Ellen]

I''m no expert, but they seem quite similar. The one you put up here looks like the prongs may be less noticable than the SP band, which I would personally like. Not sure if it''s really that way, or just the photo.

One question is, what are you putting it with, if anything? Certain styles look better with certain Erings...

 

[Diamond*Dana]

I agree with Ellen, the prongs looks smaller to me which I would prefer. Other than that, they look the same.

 

[Yekutiel]

Both the rings are very similar to the fact there are common prong settings. The difference is the side profile of the band. The one pictured above has a smooth finish on the side that makes it finer and cleaner looking. I know this because I make this wedding band that is pictured above.

 

[~*kalypso*~]

Date: 4/6/2008 3:21:07 PM
Author: Yekutiel
Both the rings are very similar to the fact there are common prong settings. The difference is the side profile of the band. The one pictured above has a smooth finish on the side that makes it finer and cleaner looking. I know this because I make this wedding band that is pictured above.

Hi.

Do you have better photos of that ring? They''re not very clear. Also, are there holes underneath the diamonds in the band?

If there are holes underneath all the diamonds in the bands in your ring selections, can you make them without? Just asking for future reference.

It looks like you have a big selection on your website but the photos are poor.

 

[melpla]

I thought it would be best to have holes underneath, so that you could clean the diamonds from the underside. Is it better without the holes?

 

[Yekutiel]

it is better to have holes. it lets the diamonds sparkle better and it is better for cleaning.Oh, and I will work on my pic''s to show more details.

 

[~*kalypso*~]

Date: 4/6/2008 10:04:07 PM
Author: melpla
I thought it would be best to have holes underneath, so that you could clean the diamonds from the underside. Is it better without the holes?

Yeah, apparently holes are better for cleaning. I've been looking that kind of stuff up.
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/whats-the-deal-with-the-tiny-holes.67547/ ,

https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/holes-inside-rings-azures.81706/

Sorry to confuse, its just a personal preference of mine to have a ring without holes! I'm just kooky like that I guess

Yekutiel: Thanks in advance for more pictures! But would you do rings without the holes?

 

[Yekutiel]

Date: 4/6/2008 10:22:09 PM
Author: ~*kalypso*~

Date: 4/6/2008 10:04:07 PM
Author: melpla
I thought it would be best to have holes underneath, so that you could clean the diamonds from the underside. Is it better without the holes?

Yeah, apparently holes are better for cleaning. I''ve been looking that kind of stuff up.
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/whats-the-deal-with-the-tiny-holes.67547/ ,

https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/holes-inside-rings-azures.81706/

Sorry to confuse, its just a personal preference of mine to have a ring without holes! I''m just kooky like that I guess

Yekutiel: Thanks in advance for more pictures! But would you do rings without the holes?

Kalypso, I wouldn’t recommend it. If you insist there is no doubt that it can be done.