francisrogers
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2014
- Messages
- 4
Hello Everyone,
I'm wondering if you could help me please with a loose diamond:
I'm debating between these two from James Allen:
1.30 Carat H SI1, HCA Score 1.4
$9,100
Depth %:59.50
Table %:60.00
Crown ∠: 33.0
Pavilion ∠: 40.7
Polish:Excellent
Symmetry:Excellent
Fluorescence:None
Girdle: Medium - Medium
L/W/D (mm): 7.09*7.12*4.23
1.20 Carat H VS2, HCA Score 1.5
$8,400
Depth %:59.60
Table %:60.00
Crown ∠: 33.5
Pavilion ∠: 40.8
Polish:Excellent
Symmetry:Excellent
Fluorescence:None
Girdle: Medium - Medium
L/W/D (mm): 6.93*6.91*4.12
Proportions and resulting HCA scores are very similar.
I am waiting on the idealscope images from James Allen, but in the mean time, does anyone have any opinions on the two?
1. Is the extra $500 worth the increase in diameter for option 1 (7.09-7.12 versus 6.93-6.91)? The cost discrepancy isn't really an issue, and I'm willing to pay this. Also, the first option has a small black inclusion on the table, but this is minor and the JA chat agent agreed that these two stones are both eye clean. Otherwise, this stone is clean, with some twinning wisps responsible for the SI1 grading.
2. Alternatively, the second option is $500 cheaper, VS2, and the images look cleaner (although both of these diamonds appear quite eye clean to me). However, it is slightly smaller at 6.93-6.9 versus 7.09-7.12.
Thanks! This is a great forum.
I'm wondering if you could help me please with a loose diamond:
I'm debating between these two from James Allen:
1.30 Carat H SI1, HCA Score 1.4
$9,100
Depth %:59.50
Table %:60.00
Crown ∠: 33.0
Pavilion ∠: 40.7
Polish:Excellent
Symmetry:Excellent
Fluorescence:None
Girdle: Medium - Medium
L/W/D (mm): 7.09*7.12*4.23
1.20 Carat H VS2, HCA Score 1.5
$8,400
Depth %:59.60
Table %:60.00
Crown ∠: 33.5
Pavilion ∠: 40.8
Polish:Excellent
Symmetry:Excellent
Fluorescence:None
Girdle: Medium - Medium
L/W/D (mm): 6.93*6.91*4.12
Proportions and resulting HCA scores are very similar.
I am waiting on the idealscope images from James Allen, but in the mean time, does anyone have any opinions on the two?
1. Is the extra $500 worth the increase in diameter for option 1 (7.09-7.12 versus 6.93-6.91)? The cost discrepancy isn't really an issue, and I'm willing to pay this. Also, the first option has a small black inclusion on the table, but this is minor and the JA chat agent agreed that these two stones are both eye clean. Otherwise, this stone is clean, with some twinning wisps responsible for the SI1 grading.
2. Alternatively, the second option is $500 cheaper, VS2, and the images look cleaner (although both of these diamonds appear quite eye clean to me). However, it is slightly smaller at 6.93-6.9 versus 7.09-7.12.
Thanks! This is a great forum.