Stoney Road
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2005
- Messages
- 5
Hello,
So have found a pair of matching stones that give great results on the HCA
Stone 1: .504, G, VS2, Depth 60.3, Table 57, Crown Angle 34.7, Pavilion Angle 40.7, Girdle thin to medium faceted, Polish and symmetry excellent, no fluorescence - HCA 1.0
Stone 2: .50, G, VS2, Depth 60.1, Table 55, Crown Angle 34.8, Pavilion Angle 40.7, Girdle very thin to thin faceted, Polish and symmetry excellent, no fluorescence - HCA .9
My only concern now is the ''very thin'' girdle on the second stone, although the Sarin report gives it a .6% min and 1.2% max, both of which are rated as ''thin'', allowing it to be a AGS 0. Should I be very concerned? it is going into a necklace, not a ring.
So have found a pair of matching stones that give great results on the HCA
Stone 1: .504, G, VS2, Depth 60.3, Table 57, Crown Angle 34.7, Pavilion Angle 40.7, Girdle thin to medium faceted, Polish and symmetry excellent, no fluorescence - HCA 1.0
Stone 2: .50, G, VS2, Depth 60.1, Table 55, Crown Angle 34.8, Pavilion Angle 40.7, Girdle very thin to thin faceted, Polish and symmetry excellent, no fluorescence - HCA .9
My only concern now is the ''very thin'' girdle on the second stone, although the Sarin report gives it a .6% min and 1.2% max, both of which are rated as ''thin'', allowing it to be a AGS 0. Should I be very concerned? it is going into a necklace, not a ring.
300x240.png)