A photomicrograph normally shows inclusions blown up to a high magnification. Because inclusions are generally unique in appearance, it might be possible to use such a photo for future re-identification if there was no easier way to be sure about the stone's identity. I doubt it would be a primary tool of identification.
Primary identifiers are shape, weight, dimensions, color, clarity, proportions measured by a Sarin/Ogi, laser inscription.
Secondary identifiers would be photos, clarity plots, UV fluorescence.
Here is a partial example of what GCAL includes in their documentation. In your opinion what does this really show, and how would it compare to the idealscope instrument?
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.