shape
carat
color
clarity

Filled Ruby vs. Corundum

minousbijoux

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
12,804
I should probably know the answer to this, but I was reading Kay's thread on rubies and LD's response and it made me start wondering. Why is it that filling is such an issue with rubies and not so much with other corundum? Is it because the red has more inclusions and therefore more room for improvement if glass or lead filled? I know there are more and more insidious and scary treatments with both, but it seems that good rubies are almost a lost cause...

LD? Gene? Anybody?
 

LD

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
10,261
The issue would be the same for both Minou.

For me, and happy to stand corrected here, filling of Rubies is (or certainly was) more common than Sapphires. Be diffusion was more common in Sapphires than Rubies (when it first began) now you see it much more with Rubies. I would assume that with Sapphires in more abundance than Rubies this has something to do with it also.

Sweeping generalisation but, for me, filling is a no go area in corundum.
 

minousbijoux

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
12,804
LD|1351356558|3293552 said:
The issue would be the same for both Minou.

For me, and happy to stand corrected here, filling of Rubies is (or certainly was) more common than Sapphires. Be diffusion was more common in Sapphires than Rubies (when it first began) now you see it much more with Rubies. I would assume that with Sapphires in more abundance than Rubies this has something to do with it also.

Sweeping generalisation but, for me, filling is a no go area in corundum.

I agree completely - its just that I've observed that so many rubies are filled whereas not so much - at least yet - with sapphires. I was attributing it solely to the greater likelihood of inclusions in ruby, but I was completely conjecturing...

I would not touch a filled ruby with 10' pole, which is why I own no rubies - too afraid of being duped since so much of the rough these days is already treated.
 

chrono

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
38,364
Because naturally clean rubies are incredibly rare compared to naturally clean sapphires. Chromium has a tendency to affect the internal growth of a gem, so whilst it imparts better colouration, it also has a tendency to challenge its clarity as well.
 

Lee Little

Shiny_Rock
Trade
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
429
Yes, there have been huge deposits found of 'Ruby' that are great candidates for lead glass filling while huge deposits of Sapphire have been found that are great candidates for Be. Either can be done to both but it is all about the best way to market a find. Best regards, Lee
 

JaneSmith

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
1,589
So even a ruby from a PS trusted vendor that says 'heat only' is probably from lead filled rough? Bugger. I've been wanting a small pair for earrings. :blackeye:
 

chrono

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
38,364
Highly unlikely, which is why they made it on the list in the first place.
 

minousbijoux

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
12,804
JaneSmith|1352485537|3301943 said:
So even a ruby from a PS trusted vendor that says 'heat only' is probably from lead filled rough? Bugger. I've been wanting a small pair for earrings. :blackeye:

No, what I meant is that if you look at the rough sources that many cutters use, these reputable rough sources sell much of their ruby rough already treated as I imagine the majority of it is treated right away. If these rough dealers have untreated ruby rough, they mark it and sell it as such. All of these folks are generally reputable, and with the exception of the occasional mistake, it is fair to feel that you can trust the vendors listed above, who, in turn, trust their dealers. That doesn't mean that you shouldn't ask and then verify with a lab report; but it does mean that if they say it it untreated or heat only, it very likely is...I hope that clarifies things a bit.
 

LD

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
10,261
Actually wherever you get it from the sensible thing to do is get it checked out. You're more sure of being in good hands with most of the vendors on the list in this forum BUT you're a buyer and buyer's have to do their own research and checking.
 

JaneSmith

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
1,589
minousbijoux|1352488932|3301988 said:
JaneSmith|1352485537|3301943 said:
So even a ruby from a PS trusted vendor that says 'heat only' is probably from lead filled rough? Bugger. I've been wanting a small pair for earrings. :blackeye:

No, what I meant is that if you look at the rough sources that many cutters use, these reputable rough sources sell much of their ruby rough already treated as I imagine the majority of it is treated right away. If these rough dealers have untreated ruby rough, they mark it and sell it as such. All of these folks are generally reputable, and with the exception of the occasional mistake, it is fair to feel that you can trust the vendors listed above, who, in turn, trust their dealers. That doesn't mean that you shouldn't ask and then verify with a lab report; but it does mean that if they say it it untreated or heat only, it very likely is...I hope that clarifies things a bit.

Oh good. I was worried for a bit there. Thank you also Chrono and LD.
I'm unlikely to do any further testing myself on such wee rubies, so I'll just have to trust the vendors and the reports.
 
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top