Both diamonds are H&A stones. Diamond 1 is $300 cheaper so the price difference is negligible.
Which one would be the better pick or do you think there are better choices out there for a 1.5+ ct stone?
Diamond 1:
. Carat: 1.566
. Depth %: 61.6
. Table %: 55.9
. Crown Angle: 34.8
. Crown %: 15.4
. Star : 52
. Pavilion Angle: 40.7
. Pavilion %: 43
. Lower Girdle %: 76
. Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
. Measurements: 7.44-7.47X4.59
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible
Diamond 2:
. Carat: 1.562
. Depth %: 61.1
. Table %: 54.9
. Crown Angle: 34.9
. Crown %: 15.7
. Star : 50
. Pavilion Angle: 40.8
. Pavilion %: 43
. Lower Girdle %: 78
. Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
. Measurements: 7.50-7.53X4.59
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible
Which one would be the better pick or do you think there are better choices out there for a 1.5+ ct stone?
Diamond 1:
. Carat: 1.566
. Depth %: 61.6
. Table %: 55.9
. Crown Angle: 34.8
. Crown %: 15.4
. Star : 52
. Pavilion Angle: 40.7
. Pavilion %: 43
. Lower Girdle %: 76
. Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
. Measurements: 7.44-7.47X4.59
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible
Diamond 2:
. Carat: 1.562
. Depth %: 61.1
. Table %: 54.9
. Crown Angle: 34.9
. Crown %: 15.7
. Star : 50
. Pavilion Angle: 40.8
. Pavilion %: 43
. Lower Girdle %: 78
. Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
. Measurements: 7.50-7.53X4.59
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible