Ty Cobb
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- May 4, 2007
- Messages
- 119
Was fooling around on signed pieces just checking out what they had in their Tiff and Cartier section, when some of the retail prices they claimed began to bug me.
This one in particular stood out at me:
http://www.signedpieces.com/item.cfm?item_id=5715
They say it retails for $60,000.00
Well looking at the certificate I will grant you that it was a D IF which would raise the price, however, the GIA report states the value of the ring to be $48,000.00
Now maybe I just got lucky on mine, but the GIA report I got on the ring I bought, valued it almost $3,000.00 higher then what I paid for it, including taxes. So basically the GIA value was 4k more then what I paid for the ring.
Yet signed pieces is claiming the ring retails for $12k more then GIA certified it for? Granted, the value could have gone up that significanly since 2002, I don''t know diamond price trends over that period.
Just for fun I have looked at 1.4''s at Tiffs that were VS1 and F color, and they were both less then $30k, significantly less I might add.
Some of the prices they qoute on there for retail are good, but others in both Tiffs and Cartier don''t seem right:
This one for example:
http://www.signedpieces.com/item.cfm?item_id=935
The .87 ct channel set VS1 H that I bought in June cost over $1k less then this one. Granted this is a slightly larger stone, however, figuring in the price increase for a channel set band, I find it strange the price difference. I did look at some simple solitares before she dropped the hint that she wanted bling in the ring as well, and while I never saw a .97, the two .95s I looked at were around $8k. I know the GIA certificate appraises it at $9,700.00, but don''t ring generally appraise for more then you pay for them?
I do realize Tiffs has apparently had a price increase over the summer, but still.
Don''t get me wrong, I still believe signed pieces offers a heck of a discount, but it seem like they try to inflate the discount sometimes.
Anyway, just curious if I am totally loony on this or if this makes sense to anyone else?
This one in particular stood out at me:
http://www.signedpieces.com/item.cfm?item_id=5715
They say it retails for $60,000.00
Well looking at the certificate I will grant you that it was a D IF which would raise the price, however, the GIA report states the value of the ring to be $48,000.00
Now maybe I just got lucky on mine, but the GIA report I got on the ring I bought, valued it almost $3,000.00 higher then what I paid for it, including taxes. So basically the GIA value was 4k more then what I paid for the ring.
Yet signed pieces is claiming the ring retails for $12k more then GIA certified it for? Granted, the value could have gone up that significanly since 2002, I don''t know diamond price trends over that period.
Just for fun I have looked at 1.4''s at Tiffs that were VS1 and F color, and they were both less then $30k, significantly less I might add.
Some of the prices they qoute on there for retail are good, but others in both Tiffs and Cartier don''t seem right:
This one for example:
http://www.signedpieces.com/item.cfm?item_id=935
The .87 ct channel set VS1 H that I bought in June cost over $1k less then this one. Granted this is a slightly larger stone, however, figuring in the price increase for a channel set band, I find it strange the price difference. I did look at some simple solitares before she dropped the hint that she wanted bling in the ring as well, and while I never saw a .97, the two .95s I looked at were around $8k. I know the GIA certificate appraises it at $9,700.00, but don''t ring generally appraise for more then you pay for them?
I do realize Tiffs has apparently had a price increase over the summer, but still.
Don''t get me wrong, I still believe signed pieces offers a heck of a discount, but it seem like they try to inflate the discount sometimes.
Anyway, just curious if I am totally loony on this or if this makes sense to anyone else?