Diamond preference

[Mamull]

OK, need some help... down between 2 stones. Need some help. Which do you prefer...why? Cleaner stone vs a little H color? Both show up eye clean but the H stands out a little more in hard lighting. Price and size are close.

http://www.agslab.com/pdf_sync_reports/104069784007-PGRH.PDF

http://www.agslab.com/pdf_sync_reports/104069784010-PGRH.PDF

Thanks,
Matt

 

[two_little_birds]

I prefer the 2nd one as it has a smaller table.

Do you have the links to the actual stones on Whiteflash?

 

[30yearsofdiamonds]

I am of the opposite opinion. I do not like to see anything under 55 percent on tables for stones that are notnOld Europeans. It will make the stone appear smaller. 57 percent table is great, and it is also one color better. But bottom line, stay away from a 54 table.

 

[Mamull]

Here's the 1.39o I, VS2: http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3059437.htm not sure if it's viewable since it's on hold.

Here's 1.394 'H': http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3059434.htm?source=pricescope

The "I" is closer to an H than a J but does have a smaller table. The "H" has a few more inclusions but does come up eye clean and stands out just a little more when next to "I." But, they'll never be close together. It's for a single solitaire ring.

Thanks for your help.

 

[30yearsofdiamonds]

Re: Diamond preferencebody

Both are VS2, nobody in this world could see the inclusions in either stone without a loupe, so no need to worry. Still prefer the 57 table.

 

[tyty333]

I'd probably go with the H. I like smaller tables but I'm ok with 57% too. They are both beautiful stones.

 

[Mamull]

Thank you all.