Diamond for a Pendant!!!

[sunset522]

HEllo all!!!

Can you guys please comment on these three stones and which one to go with?? These are for a pendant... thanks much!!!

Diamond 1:
Carat/Clarity/color: 1.227, H SI 1
Depth: 60.4%
Table: 55%
Crown angle: 34.6
Pav angle: 40.7
HCA score: 0.9 (Ex, Ex, Ex, VG)
Inclusion info: has a tiny crystal, a small cluster of pinpoints and a very small, faint needle. The cluster of pinpoints are black inclusions..
Price: $7,203.72

Diamond 2:
Carat/Clarity/color:1.228 H SI 1
Depth: 60.5%
Table: 54%
Crown angle: 34.7
Pav angle: 40.6
HCA score: 0.7 (Ex, Ex, Ex, VG)
Inclusion info: has two tiny crystals, a couple of very faint clusters of pinpoints and two pinpoints near the edge. ALso has black inclusions...
Price: $7,209.59

The Brillancescope on these stones are Very high and above..

Which one should I go for? Also do you think they are good stones? The angles and measurements seem to fall into the 'sweet' zone.. I'd LOVE to hear from you diamond experts

Thanks in advance!!!!!!!!

 

[valeria101]

Both are freakin' perfect...

"Pinpoints" are an academic type of inclusion that never shows to mere mortals. The rest... no idea. You could ask the seller to judge the "eye clean" quality of each for you, since no one likes shipping diamonds out just to have them them returned packed with complaints. If the pendant will be a bezel, inclusions will show less, as far as I can tell.

Just one question more

 

[valeria101]

There is some info about the clarity of that piece.

 

[Cath]

If Whiteflash confirms theirs is eye-clean, that''s the one I''d pick. It''s the least expensive -- and the better color is a bonus!

 

[sunset522]

Turns out that the whiteflash stone had visible inclusions.. so i decided to remove that as one of my options..

 

[Cath]

That''s too bad -- too good to be true. It looks to me like a toss-up between the other two stones. Since they''re at the same vendor why don''t you ask them which one they think is better?