- Sep 10, 2003
Seriously. Given than anything (and I do mean ANYTHING) can be classified at any time, and that her predecessors did LITERALLY the same thing (spin it however you want, and write as many law changes as you so choose to make it ok for them, and not for her, that's fine...), this doesn't surprise me. It was a political witch hunt.Madam Bijoux|1467737543|4051647 said:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/05/taxpayer_tab_for_investigating_hillary_over_20_million.html Different sources estimated the cost between $13,000 and $39,000 per dayMadam Bijoux|1467737543|4051647 said:
Yup, Waste of money when we all knew what the end result will be.Madam Bijoux|1467737543|4051647 said:
Entirely.Dancing Fire|1467758968|4051784 said:
Well DF, if you've joined our side be sure and register so you can get your free Welcome Happy Meal ... deep-fried human baby, fried okra, mashed potato, and apple and cute-baby–kitten pie for dessert.Dancing Fire|1467768681|4051862 said:
The neo-fascists are going to win in France. Let's not let them win in the US, too. Be sick; vote for Clinton; and at least keep the neo-Nazi clown out of the Oval Office here in the US.AprilBaby|1467768303|4051857 said:
I totally understand.AprilBaby|1467828839|4052142 said:kenny|1467769933|4051873 said:
I have voted both ways in the past. Voted for Obama last two elections (and I'm from Chicago) and I'm very disappointed he didn't get more done. He seemed a very passive president. I'm not sure I could vote for the Donald either. I'm trying to get over my guilt to my civic duty to vote at all. I don't like Bernie either.
Would love to see Colin Powell run. Hated Ted Cruz more than Hillary. Sadly I don't see anyone in the near future that appeals at all.
I absolutely can not vote for Hillary so if my guilt gets the best of me, yes, I will vote for Trump. But I would hold my nose and puke.
While I agree that she is the loser in this case, I don't believe that it was "fixed" at all, so don't you dare speak for me. I've worked for DOD before, I interned there. And based on that history, plus the research DH did, I did, and talking to several family members who worked DOD and various branches of government, thru varied ranks of classification, what I know is that nothing she did was new. She was not hacked. Yes, it was risky, but so were the moves of her predecessors, because she had a hell of lot better security options.Dancing Fire|1467771339|4051881 said:Either way HC is the loser in this case...
Had Comey recommended criminal charges against her then she would be in big trouble. Now that there will be no charges against her 70% of Americans knew/believe it was fixed
Trump would have ZERO chance of winning against anyone else except HC. Clinton should be ahead by 20% not 5%.