petrock<3
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2010
- Messages
- 1,146
Here are three different badly done photoshop mock ups of my band choices. Just got off phone with Tacori concierge who was an utter delight.
There are:
1. Thickest, with about 1.6 or 1.7 mm step cuts- same a halo step cuts (channel setting adds metal width so about 2.5mm) this is band of Tacori 2517 http://www.tacori.com/Engagement-Rings/HT2517EC75X55
2. Medium somewhere around 1.4 mm or 1.5 stones, maybe 2.2 mm not sure (same band as 2643 but with step cuts)
http://www.tacori.com/Engagement-Rings/2643RD65
3. Thinnest, total width 1.8 mm it would have tiny step cuts instead of princess model 45
http://www.tacori.com/Engagement-Rings/4515PR55
Doesnt seem like a huge difference in width, but you do notice it!
There are:
1. Thickest, with about 1.6 or 1.7 mm step cuts- same a halo step cuts (channel setting adds metal width so about 2.5mm) this is band of Tacori 2517 http://www.tacori.com/Engagement-Rings/HT2517EC75X55
2. Medium somewhere around 1.4 mm or 1.5 stones, maybe 2.2 mm not sure (same band as 2643 but with step cuts)
http://www.tacori.com/Engagement-Rings/2643RD65
3. Thinnest, total width 1.8 mm it would have tiny step cuts instead of princess model 45
http://www.tacori.com/Engagement-Rings/4515PR55
Doesnt seem like a huge difference in width, but you do notice it!