Can you please help with these 3 RB diamonds

[Riverrock]

I narrowed my search results to 3 diamonds & I hope if the pricescopers can help me choose.
My favorite is the first one because it has a nice spread. The 1st & 2nd are nearly the same price while the last is 500$ more. Although the last one is E and hence more valuable, but the setting that I have chosen has diamonds of an average color of G-H so am not sure how this will look specially that they are princess cut.
Any help would be appreciated

Diamond 1
Shape: Round
Carat weight: 1.07
Color: G
Clarity: VS2
Certificate: GIA

Depth: 59.2%
Table: 61.0%
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Girdle: Medium to slightly thick
Culet: None
Fluorescence: None
Measurements: 6.65*6.62*3.93
Crown 34
Pav 40.4

Diamond 2
Shape: Round
Carat weight: 1.01
Color: G
Clarity: VS2
Certificate: GIA

Depth: 62.8%
Table: 56.0%
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Girdle: Medium to slightly thick
Culet: None
Fluorescence: None
Measurements: 6.39*6.35*4.00
crown 36
Pav 40.6

Diamond 3
Shape: Round
Carat weight: 1.02

Color: E
Clarity: VS2
Certificate: GIA

Depth: 62.7%
Table: 56.0%
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Girdle: Slightly thick to thick
Culet: None
Fluorescence: None
Measurements: 6.35*6.41*4.00
Crown 34.5
Pav 40.8

 

[Riverrock]

 

[Riverrock]

diamond 2

 

[Riverrock]

diamond 3

 

[Lorelei]

Pass on the first as it is in the shallow shallow region with the angles, the second looks good within fiery ideal cut range ( FIC) which means you might notice additional fire if the lighting is right - the extrea depth is acceptable in this type of diamond. The third looks good too but a touch deep.

 

[stone-cold11]

2nd one gets my vote. 3rd one has a sl-tk - tk girdle which is hiding weight but angle wise looks good.

Are you going to request an Idealscope image?

 

[Riverrock]

Thank you all, I really appreciate your inputs. Ill definitely consider diamond 2.
I found few more GIA diamonds and I wish if you compere them to diamond 2.

Diamond 4
Measurements: 6.62 - 6.65 x 4.11 mm
Carat Weight: 1.11 carat
Color Grade: G
Clarity Grade: VS2
Cut Grade: Excellent
Proportions:
Depth: 62.0%
Table: 56%
Crown Angle: 35.0°
Crown Height: 15.5%
Pavilion Angle: 40.8°
Pavilion Depth: 43.0%
Star length: 50%
Lower Half: 70%
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick, Faceted (3.5%)
Culet: None
Finish:
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Excellent
Fluorescence: None



Diamond 5
measurements: 6.65 - 6.68 x 4.14 mm
Carat Weight: 1.13 carat
Color Grade: G
Clarity Grade: VS2
Cut Grade: Excellent
Proportions:
Depth: 62.1%
Table: 57%
Crown Angle: 34.0°
Crown Height: 14.5%
Pavilion Angle: 41.0°
Pavilion Depth: 43.5%
Star length: 55%
Lower Half: 80%
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick, Faceted (4.0%)
Culet: None
Finish:
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent

Diamond 5
Measurements: 6.53 - 6.55 x 3.93 mm
Carat Weight: 1.02 carat
Color Grade: G
Clarity Grade: VS1
Cut Grade: Excellent
Proportions:
Depth: 60.1%
Table: 59%
Crown Angle: 33.5°
Crown Height: 13.5%
Pavilion Angle: 40.8°
Pavilion Depth: 43.0%
Star length: 50%
Lower Half: 80%
Girdle: Medium, Faceted (3.5%)
Culet: None
Finish:
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Fluorescence: None

I need to take a decision soon so hope you all can help

 

[Lorelei]

#4 definitely needs an Idealscope image with that angle combo and the lower girdle facet measurements.

#5 has potential, an IS would be useful also.

#3 looks ok but the table is a bit larger than I prefer.

 

[stone-cold11]

Totally agree with Lorelei''s assessment. Nothing more to add.

 

[Riverrock]

Thank you for your quick reply. I asked the dealer if they can supply IS images of the last three.Hopefully they will be.

Can you put them in order of most preferred diamonds 2,4,5 & 6 in terms of size, value & light performance?

Thank you again lorelli & stone cold.

Waiting for more Expert opinions

 

[stone-cold11]

5, 4, 2, then 6.