Calling Rich....Can you help me with a DiamCalc Report???

[tintin]

Hi Rich, I found this stone at my local jeweller and they didn't have idealscope. I would ask you a favour to help me with DiamCalc Report for my stone, thanks alot.

1.035 RB
Table: 55
Depth:60.9
crown angle: 34.8 15.4%
Pavi angle: 40.9 43.3%
Girdle: 1.2-1.4%
Culet: 0.5%

What do you think?

 

[pricescope]

Tintin, numbers look good and I don't think DiamCalc simulation would add more. Here are DiamCalc result for your numbers and 46% star facets and 80% lower girdle facets.

 

[pricescope]

Now, if you only change star facets to 48%, leakage will change sligtly as well...

 

[pricescope]

My point is that there is no reason in splitting hairs with tools like DiamCalc when you have only average numbers.

 

[tintin]

----------------
On 1/25/2004 12:36:25 PM leonid wrote:

My point is that there is no reason in splitting hairs with tools like DiamCalc when you have only average numbers.----------------

Thanks a lot. But I don't understand the changes of facets %

By the way, regarding the pics, do you think it's a good stone?

 

[pricescope]

------------
Thanks a lot. But I don't understand the changes of facets %
----------------

------------
By the way, regarding the pics, do you think it's a good stone?
----------------

The angles are very close to Tolkowsky ideal cut. As you can see, DiamCalc evaluation shows light return close to 1 = Tolkowsky proportions.