Calling on Experts! Opinions on these 2 diamonds?

[jmuchris78]

I just sent back to WF my .92 RB on my JA setting....beautiful diamond but I just think it may be a bit small for the GF.

WF has two diamonds in my size and budget requirement....looking for excellent cut, decent color (H,I,J) and eye clean from all angles. Here are links to the two diamonds...is one of these a go or should I just pass on them and look somewhere else. I am really looking to spend around $5000 or less and hopefully end up with a RB, excellent cut, eye clean 1.2 carat or larger.

Thanks again!


http://www.whiteflash.com/diamonds/Diamond_Details.aspx?idno=2080411#


http://www.whiteflash.com/diamonds/Diamond_Details.aspx?idno=2080406

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 6/24/2009 8:02:40 AM
Author:jmuchris78
I just sent back to WF my .92 RB on my JA setting....beautiful diamond but I just think it may be a bit small for the GF.

WF has two diamonds in my size and budget requirement....looking for excellent cut, decent color (H,I,J) and eye clean from all angles. Here are links to the two diamonds...is one of these a go or should I just pass on them and look somewhere else. I am really looking to spend around $5000 or less and hopefully end up with a RB, excellent cut, eye clean 1.2 carat or larger.

Thanks again!


http://www.whiteflash.com/diamonds/Diamond_Details.aspx?idno=2080411#


http://www.whiteflash.com/diamonds/Diamond_Details.aspx?idno=2080406

Hi Chris

No problem. Out of the two I prefer the second, although there is a little leakage in IS, it might not be perceptible to the naked eye in reality.

What I would do is contact WF and ask them what they could suggest, it depends on whether you want good ( as in the ones above) or great ( cut to top standards such as their branded hearts and arrows ACA). If you want the most size possible then non branded Expert Selection is certainly a consideration. Check also if you go for either of these that the diamond is eyeclean to your standards, the second diamond has grade setting clouds so check these are not impacting the brilliance of the diamond by asking WF to check.

 

[Ellen]

Date: 6/24/2009 8:14:41 AM
Author: Lorelei

Hi Chris

No problem. Out of the two I prefer the second, although there is a little leakage in IS, it might not be perceptible to the naked eye in reality.

What I would do is contact WF and ask them what they could suggest, it depends on whether you want good ( as in the ones above) or great ( cut to top standards such as their branded hearts and arrows ACA). If you want the most size possible then non branded Expert Selection is certainly a consideration. Check also if you go for either of these that the diamond is eyeclean to your standards, the second diamond has grade setting clouds so check these are not impacting the brilliance of the diamond by asking WF to check.

Ditto.

An alternative would be this one, if you could swing it. If eyeclean of course. And you could always have them compare this one with the other as far as performance.

http://www.whiteflash.com/round/Round-cut-diamond-2105151.htm#

 

[Lorelei]

Good find Ellenator!!

 

[Ellen]

Thankies!

 

[jmuchris78]

Thanks ladies!

This is really helpful information! I will reach out to WF and see how these compare

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 6/24/2009 9:23:48 AM
Author: jmuchris78
Thanks ladies!

This is really helpful information! I will reach out to WF and see how these compare

Miss Ellen and I are glad to help!

 

[Ellen]

Date: 6/24/2009 9:28:34 AM
Author: Lorelei

Miss Ellen and I are glad to help!

Indeed. Let us know how it goes.