- Joined
- Feb 12, 2018
- Messages
- 3,932
The State Dept.'s inquiry into Clinton's emails found "no systemic or deliberate mishandling of classified information." Talk about an anticlimactic end to the most overblown, nothing burger of a scandal.
And did the Corrupt/Lamestream/Fake News media with its unfair liberal bias plaster this all over its headlines? Nope. NYT in particular buried it in page 16 when it ran the story on October 18. Enemy of the People indeed!
Now let us forevermore lay to rest the "But her emails!" nonsense. (Wishful thinking, I know.)
If you want to read the findings for yourself:
And did the Corrupt/Lamestream/Fake News media with its unfair liberal bias plaster this all over its headlines? Nope. NYT in particular buried it in page 16 when it ran the story on October 18. Enemy of the People indeed!
Now let us forevermore lay to rest the "But her emails!" nonsense. (Wishful thinking, I know.)
If you want to read the findings for yourself:
APD Uncovered No Persuasive Evidence of Systemic Misuse Relative to the Deliberate Introduction of Classified Information to Unclassified Systems
While there were some instances of classified information being inappropriately introduced into an unclassified system in furtherance of expedience, by and large, 'the individuals interviewed were aware of security policies and did their best to implement them in their operations. Correspondence with the Secretary is inherently sensitive, and is therefore open for broad interpretation as to classification, particularly with respect to Foreign Government Information. Instances of classified information being deliberately transmitted via unclassified email were the rare exception and resulted in adjudicated security violations. There was no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information.