shape
carat
color
clarity

Attorney General Sessions Lied Under Oath

AGBF

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jan 26, 2003
Messages
22,161
It should be no surprise that yet another member of Trump's staff has been found to have lied about his contact with the Kremlin during the Obama administration, undermining the foreign policy of the United States. That is, now, standard behavior in the Trump administration. When is a bi-partisan Congressional commission that does not meet in secret like the intelligence committees going to investigate this entire matter and demand to get to the bottom of it?

This is from "The Washington Post".

"Then-Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) spoke twice last year with Russia’s ambassador to the United States, Justice Department officials said, encounters he did not disclose when asked about possible contacts between members of President Trump’s campaign and representatives of Moscow during Sessions’s confirmation hearing to become attorney general.

One of the meetings was a private conversation between Sessions and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak that took place in September in the senator’s office, at the height of what U.S. intelligence officials say was a Russian cyber campaign to upend the U.S. presidential race.

The previously undisclosed discussions could fuel new congressional calls for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate Russia’s alleged role in the 2016 presidential election. As attorney general, Sessions oversees the Justice Department and the FBI, which have been leading investigations into Russian meddling and any links to Trump’s associates. He has so far resisted calls to recuse himself.


When Sessions spoke with Kislyak in July and September, the senator was a senior member of the influential Armed Services Committee as well as one of Trump’s top foreign policy advisers. Sessions played a prominent role supporting Trump on the stump after formally joining the campaign in February 2016.

Then-Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) spoke twice in 2016 with Russia's ambassador to the U.S., Sergey Kislyak, but did not mention this during his confirmation hearing to become U.S. attorney general. Sessions was asked about possible contacts between President Trump's campaign and the Russian government.

At his Jan. 10 Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing, Sessions was asked by Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) what he would do if he learned of any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of the 2016 campaign.

'I’m not aware of any of those activities,” he responded. He added: “I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians.'

Officials said Sessions did not consider the conversations relevant to the lawmakers’ questions and did not remember in detail what he discussed with Kislyak.

'There was absolutely nothing misleading about his answer,' said Sarah Isgur Flores, Sessions’s spokeswoman.

In January, Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) asked Sessions for answers to written questions. 'Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?' Leahy wrote.

Sessions responded with one word: “No.”

In a statement issued Wednesday night, Sessions said he 'never met with any Russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign. I have no idea what this allegation is about. It is false.'

Justice officials said Sessions met with Kislyak on Sept. 8 in his capacity as a member of the armed services panel rather than in his role as a Trump campaign surrogate
."

Does he have multiple personality disorder? When one of his personalities is meeting with a Russian ambassador, the other one is not present?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/sessions-spoke-twice-with-russian-ambassador-during-trumps-presidential-campaign-justice-officials-say/2017/03/01/77205eda-feac-11e6-99b4-9e613afeb09f_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_no-name%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.90f47de30e93

AGBF
 
He probably just didn't recall. If his meetings w/the Russian ambassador were part of his job as senator, then he probably didn't view them as 'Campaign'-related activities.

What ever happened to 'innocent until proven guilty'? :confused:

img_0370.png
 
:lol: That Russian Ambassador- he's a forgettable guy. This now makes two of Trump's cabinet that just plum forgot! about meeting with him- multiple times!

At the very least, this is enough for Sessions to need to recuse himself from overseeing Trump/Russia.
 
This is an interesting tidbit. He was the only member as far as we know to meet with the Russian Ambassador as part of the ASC.

screen_shot_2017-03-02_at_7.png
 
JoCoJenn|1488456282|4135493 said:
He probably just didn't recall. If his meetings w/the Russian ambassador were part of his job as senator, then he probably didn't view them as 'Campaign'-related activities.

What ever happened to 'innocent until proven guilty'? :confused:
He is being very slippery right now Jenn. He isn't denying that the meetings took place. He is just denying that he didn't speak of the presidential campaign with the ambassador. To many, this looks fishy.
 
Jeez this is reminiscent of Bill Clinton bumping into Loretta Lynch and republicans went beserk. No matter what is SAID, it looked BAD, and this situation LOOKS WORSE and he lied. He should resign immediately.
 
JoCoJenn|1488456282|4135493 said:
He probably just didn't recall. If his meetings w/the Russian ambassador were part of his job as senator, then he probably didn't view them as 'Campaign'-related activities.

What ever happened to 'innocent until proven guilty'? :confused:

Didn't remember? Seriously you jest? If he didn't remember then he must be senile.

I ask you: if this was a democratic administration would you feel the same?
 
Investigate all of it. Its only fair. If the outcome is different than Clinton's we will know it was a lynch mob. Leaks in the intelligence agency need to be investigated also and if perpetrators are found they should be prosecuted.
 
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RclT5T4xAgo
Actually he said he didn't have any communications with the Russians.

Now he is saying he didn't discuss anything about the presidential campaign with the Russians.

If he didn't remember meeting with this person, how could he remember the content of the meeting?
 
Tekate|1488464915|4135517 said:
I ask you: if this was a democratic administration would you feel the same?

I voiced concerns when the democratic administration couldn't recall things ... many times ... and said that without further independent investigation, a precedent would be set.

Seems my ESPN was on point.

redwood66 said:
Investigate all of it. Its only fair. If the outcome is different than Clinton's we will know it was a lynch mob. Leaks in the intelligence agency need to be investigated also and if perpetrators are found they should be prosecuted.

Agreed; I'd say this one should get in line though; Benghazi & the email server were in the investigation pipeline first. :D
 
House Cat|1488470120|4135543 said:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RclT5T4xAgo
Actually he said he didn't have any communications with the Russians.

Now he is saying he didn't discuss anything about the presidential campaign with the Russians.

If he didn't remember meeting with this person, how could he remember the content of the meeting?

He was suddenly reminded! It isn't as though all of this smoke around Russia is new. That should be one (or two) meetings he should have remembered, if he's telling the truth. And, assuming he is, he should still absolutely recuse himself. I think he should have from the beginning, being such a prominent Trump surrogate, but there's really no excuse for him to remain now without looking as guilty as possible.

If there's nothing to hide, remove anyone with prominent ties to the Trump campaign and get the damn investigations going. The stubbornness and the stonewalling only makes it look like there IS something to hide, which, at this point, is looking pretty likely. It is comical for me to think of Hillary in this situation. Heads would be ROLLING.

Republican or Democrat, if a hostile foreign power- hell, any foreign power- is meddling in and possibly directly helping a candidate win, it is unacceptable. No true patriot would look the other way for tax cuts.
 
JoCoJenn|1488470373|4135545 said:
Tekate|1488464915|4135517 said:
I ask you: if this was a democratic administration would you feel the same?

I voiced concerns when the democratic administration couldn't recall things ... many times ... and said that without further independent investigation, a precedent would be set.

Seems my ESPN was on point.

redwood66 said:
Investigate all of it. Its only fair. If the outcome is different than Clinton's we will know it was a lynch mob. Leaks in the intelligence agency need to be investigated also and if perpetrators are found they should be prosecuted.

Agreed; I'd say this one should get in line though; Benghazi & the email server were in the investigation pipeline first. :D

In the genuine interest of national security, these current issues are far more pressing.
 
If any one of US lied under oath, you bet your a$$ that we'd be looking at jail time, significant fines, lawyer/legal fees that are astronomical.
 
Unclear whether or not Sessions lied to congress during the confirmation hearings. The Senator (the one from SNL, I think) asked specifically about meeting with Russians concerning the election. So far, there's no evidence that happened. If not, then Sessions didn't lie.

EB, just when did Hillary's head roll?
 
JoCoJenn|1488456282|4135493 said:
He probably just didn't recall. If his meetings w/the Russian ambassador were part of his job as senator, then he probably didn't view them as 'Campaign'-related activities.

What ever happened to 'innocent until proven guilty'? :confused:

Jenn, pic is accurate description of the Dems since the election.

Hopefully, Trump administration will be able to lower taxes, repeal Obamacare, secure our borders, greatly improve the economy, getting citizens back to work at good jobs, etc. it wouldn't be easy under any circumstances, but with the constant witch hunt, oh my!
 
AnnaH|1488477003|4135593 said:
Unclear whether or not Sessions lied to congress during the confirmation hearings. The Senator (the one from SNL, I think) asked specifically about meeting with Russians concerning the election. So far, there's no evidence that happened. If not, then Sessions didn't lie.

EB, just when did Hillary's head roll?
No evidence what happened?
 
I love the conservative reaction in this thread.

Where's that "but her emails" sign when you need it :lol: :lol:
 
telephone89|1488479085|4135601 said:
I love the conservative reaction in this thread.

Where's that "but her emails" sign when you need it :lol: :lol:
o0ujojz_0.jpg

You rang? :)
 
House Cat|1488478293|4135598 said:
AnnaH|1488477003|4135593 said:
Unclear whether or not Sessions lied to congress during the confirmation hearings. The Senator (the one from SNL, I think) asked specifically about meeting with Russians concerning the election. So far, there's no evidence that happened. If not, then Sessions didn't lie.

EB, just when did Hillary's head roll?
No evidence what happened?

No evidence that Sessions (or anyone else) colluded with the Russians regarding the election.
 
lovedogs|1488479287|4135603 said:
telephone89|1488479085|4135601 said:
I love the conservative reaction in this thread.

Where's that "but her emails" sign when you need it :lol: :lol:
o0ujojz_0.jpg

You rang? :)
:lol: :lol: :lol:

bern1.png
 
AnnaH|1488477003|4135593 said:
Unclear whether or not Sessions lied to congress during the confirmation hearings. The Senator (the one from SNL, I think) asked specifically about meeting with Russians concerning the election. So far, there's no evidence that happened. If not, then Sessions didn't lie.

EB, just when did Hillary's head roll?

Actually, at the time of questioning, he said he did not have communications with the Russians. There's been some subsequent back-pedalling on what he meant.

FRANKEN: CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week, that included information that “Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.” These documents also allegedly say “there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.” Again, I’m telling you this as it’s coming out, so, you know.

But if it’s true, it’s obviously extremely serious, and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

SESSIONS: Senator Franken, I’m not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I’m unable to comment on it.
 
"In the course of the campaign." As I said, it was specific.
If anyone in the Trump campaign colluded with the Russions to affect the election, that's very serious, and we need to know about it. But so far, we know nothing.
 
telephone89|1488479611|4135609 said:
lovedogs|1488479287|4135603 said:
telephone89|1488479085|4135601 said:
I love the conservative reaction in this thread.

Where's that "but her emails" sign when you need it :lol: :lol:
o0ujojz_0.jpg

You rang? :)
:lol: :lol: :lol:


Hillary screwed Bernie royally.
 
ruby59|1488481451|4135619 said:
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/03/01/ex-clinton-volunteer-fired-after-writing-derogatory-tweet-about/21866095/

Ex Clinton volunteer, although I am not surprised.

Um, did you mean to put this in this thread?
 
At least when I red herring it is related to the overall topic :roll: :lol:
 
It's all one big fat coincidence...especially the lying! Innocent people never need to lie. JS lied about holding meetings with the Russian ambassador. He specifically stated he didn't meet with anyone from Russia. Scroll up. I posted video of his testimony.
 
E B|1488481869|4135621 said:
ruby59|1488481451|4135619 said:
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/03/01/ex-clinton-volunteer-fired-after-writing-derogatory-tweet-about/21866095/

Ex Clinton volunteer, although I am not surprised.

Um, did you mean to put this in this thread?

It is exactly where it belongs relevant to the fact Hillary and Bernie were both referred to above.

Hillary did not lose because of any type of collusion with Russia.

She lost because her true self came out in those emails.

And the people who backed her are as vile as she is.

And Bernie should be one of the first to investigate Hillary because she screwed him big time.
 
telephone89|1488481930|4135622 said:
At least when I red herring it is related to the overall topic :roll: :lol:


I explained it all out for you.

But why didn't you ask that question of the person who posted the Hillary sign and picture of Bernie.
 
ruby59|1488482195|4135627 said:
It is exactly where it belongs relevant to the fact Hillary and Bernie were both referred to above.

Neither was to change the subject at hand. I can't speak for telephone, but it appears Bernie's laughing face was used as a laughing emoji would be? And I don't think that meme refers to what you think it does, FWIW. BTW, Bernie addressed this when it happened and said had their emails been revealed, they'd have said worse. And the Trump campaign emails? Hoo boy.

Back to the actual subject, this is one wild news day. We had a quiet one and, of course, BAM. No wonder Trump was railing on the NYT and WaPo the other day.

A little levity. You can't make this sh*t up, I swear. :lol:

screen_shot_2017-03-02_at_2.png

probably.png
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top