From the collection again. I can barely keep track of all the pieces.
Gemologist's comments:
1. OEC
2. Center diamond weight: 1.19 carats
3. Tiny, insignificant chip (his comments)
4. High quality, clean stone (his comments)
5. Measurements of diamond: 7.1 average diameter, 3.88 depth, girdle - thin to extremely thin, no culet, table size - 53,
6. Color/clarity: stone at least VS1+. He couldn't see any flaws (under microscope), but did not remove stone to check under prongs. Color - J, which gemologist reports is a "complete guess."
7. Sapphires are synthetic. Note: When I asked him why would someone put synthetic stones in such a nice ring, he told me that when this ring was made, synthetic sapphires were more expensive than real sapphires. Go figure!
8. Weight: 3.07 grams
It was very difficult to get a picture of this ring. I can tell you that it's incredibly comfortable, which was a complete surprise considering that the other rings are not comfortable, at least on my fingers.
Gemologist's comments:
1. OEC
2. Center diamond weight: 1.19 carats
3. Tiny, insignificant chip (his comments)
4. High quality, clean stone (his comments)
5. Measurements of diamond: 7.1 average diameter, 3.88 depth, girdle - thin to extremely thin, no culet, table size - 53,
6. Color/clarity: stone at least VS1+. He couldn't see any flaws (under microscope), but did not remove stone to check under prongs. Color - J, which gemologist reports is a "complete guess."
7. Sapphires are synthetic. Note: When I asked him why would someone put synthetic stones in such a nice ring, he told me that when this ring was made, synthetic sapphires were more expensive than real sapphires. Go figure!
8. Weight: 3.07 grams
It was very difficult to get a picture of this ring. I can tell you that it's incredibly comfortable, which was a complete surprise considering that the other rings are not comfortable, at least on my fingers.