woobug02
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2004
- Messages
- 2,153
Anyone use two trilians to create a marquise look?
- Thread starter woobug02
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2003
- Messages
- 15,808
Someone thought of it already - a brand cuts diamond "parts" just for this. You may want to look down this link
The trick works reasonably well on small stones (Jenifer got a ring like that - quite a stunner!), but the gap between the two will be rather obvious on a large piece. I would rather J/I1, really. If you manage to find a brilliant marq with a whiff of fluorescence and discrete inclusions, that would look pretty darn great, I think.
To gte rid of the gap and create the perfect illusion, one facet of the "parts" would need to be flat... so that it fits flush with the next. I do not think such 'components' made to add up to a marquize exist. However, a version of "emerald cut" is out there:
(from GNN)
This one is made up from 9 modified step cuts meant for invisible setting. I almost forgot about it...
If you like bezel settings, why not, after all. 'Guess these would make the perfect pendant or pin, but can't see why not a ring if you so wish.
The trick works reasonably well on small stones (Jenifer got a ring like that - quite a stunner!), but the gap between the two will be rather obvious on a large piece. I would rather J/I1, really. If you manage to find a brilliant marq with a whiff of fluorescence and discrete inclusions, that would look pretty darn great, I think.
To gte rid of the gap and create the perfect illusion, one facet of the "parts" would need to be flat... so that it fits flush with the next. I do not think such 'components' made to add up to a marquize exist. However, a version of "emerald cut" is out there:
This one is made up from 9 modified step cuts meant for invisible setting. I almost forgot about it...
If you like bezel settings, why not, after all. 'Guess these would make the perfect pendant or pin, but can't see why not a ring if you so wish.
- Status
300x240.png)