1.01 ct
5.57*5.56*3.78
stk
68 depth
57 table
.97 ct
5.71*5.70*3.77
m-stk
66.1 depth
59 table
Makes me wonder.....why and how on the ct weight?
The 0.97 stone is bigger because it has small depth, as a result bigger area(length to width). The 1.01 stone has a lot of weight hidden in the pavilion. But don''t get me wrong, based on numbers, it is recommended that you buy a asscher with a high 60s or low 70s depth to get a beautiful stone.
I''m not an asscher expert by any means, so maybe I am missing something basic, but this doesn''t make sense to me. The weight has to be in either the depth, the girdle or the spread. I would double check that the numbers you have are correct. It sounds as if there might be an error -- most likely in the first stone''s diameter.
Clif, the price your quoted for an 1 carat asscher is really low. The forum would like to know more numbers on the stone. Ask for a sarin report on the stone to know the crown/pavilion angles. Mainly, I would like to know whether the stone has any sort of flourescence. Can you post more details?
need crown hight info and pictures.
Judging an asscher is 99.9% eyeballs the numbers will get you within a mile but thats about it.
Iv posted my opinion on what to look for in asschers bout a hundred times lately read some of the other asscher threads here.