I have read on this forum table% < depth%
(more fire?)
On the right Table% is higher than Depth%
I have read in many places that the crown height of 8% or 9% or higher is good
On the right table% is 7.9% Left one is 12.3%
Girdle - Neither has tn-tk
Symmetry/Polish is very good for both
It seems like the one on Left looks better from the given numbers. Any body thinks otherwise? There are plenty of you very knowledgeable ... Please write your responses
Carat 2.03 (GIA 2.04) 2.03 (GIA 2.03)
Length 7.08mm 7.07 mm
Width 6.84mm 7.05mm
GIA (7.14*6.88*5.00) GIA (7.11*7.08*4.9
Depth 5.02mm (73.4%) 4.99mm (70.8%)
(GIA 72.7%) (GIA 70.5%)
Table 4.30mm (62.9%) 5.20MM(73.8%)
(GIA 63%) (GIA 74%)
Crown Angle 37.7 37.1
Pav Angle 39.4 57.5
Pav Height 57.6% 59.7%
Crown Height 12.3% 7.9%
Girdle 3.6% 3.1%
(3.2% - 3.9% GIA tn-stk)(2.7% - 3.5% GIA vtn-stk)
(more fire?)
On the right Table% is higher than Depth%
I have read in many places that the crown height of 8% or 9% or higher is good
On the right table% is 7.9% Left one is 12.3%
Girdle - Neither has tn-tk
Symmetry/Polish is very good for both
It seems like the one on Left looks better from the given numbers. Any body thinks otherwise? There are plenty of you very knowledgeable ... Please write your responses
Carat 2.03 (GIA 2.04) 2.03 (GIA 2.03)
Length 7.08mm 7.07 mm
Width 6.84mm 7.05mm
GIA (7.14*6.88*5.00) GIA (7.11*7.08*4.9
Depth 5.02mm (73.4%) 4.99mm (70.8%)
(GIA 72.7%) (GIA 70.5%)
Table 4.30mm (62.9%) 5.20MM(73.8%)
(GIA 63%) (GIA 74%)
Crown Angle 37.7 37.1
Pav Angle 39.4 57.5
Pav Height 57.6% 59.7%
Crown Height 12.3% 7.9%
Girdle 3.6% 3.1%
(3.2% - 3.9% GIA tn-stk)(2.7% - 3.5% GIA vtn-stk)