1,2,3,4, come on baby say you love me

[mintve]

which one should I love the most?

#1
Report: GIA
. Shape: Round Ideal Cut
. Carat: 1.21
. Depth %: 61.9
. Table %: 56
. Crown Angle: 35
. Crown %: 15.5
. Star : 50
. Pavilion Angle: 40.8
. Pavilion %: 43
. Lower Girdle %: 75
. Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick Faceted
. Measurements: 6.81-6.85X4.23
. Polish: Excellent
. Symmetry: Excellent
. Culet: None
. Fluorescence: Faint
$6468


#2
Report: AGS
. Shape: A Cut Above H&A
. Carat: 1.215
. Depth %: 61.5
. Table %: 55.6
. Crown Angle: 34.8
. Crown %: 15.5
. Star : 51
. Pavilion Angle: 40.7
. Pavilion %: 43
. Lower Girdle %: 75
. Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
. Measurements: 6.84-6.88X4.22
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible
$6580

#3
Report: AGS
. Shape: A Cut Above H&A
. Carat: 1.217
. Depth %: 61.7
. Table %: 55.3
. Crown Angle: 34.8
. Crown %: 15.6
. Star : 52
. Pavilion Angle: 40.7
. Pavilion %: 42.9
. Lower Girdle %: 77
. Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
. Measurements: 6.84-6.86X4.23
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible
$6952

#4
Report: GIA
. Shape: Round Ideal Cut
. Carat: 1.23
. Depth %: 61.3
. Table %: 55
. Crown Angle: 35
. Crown %: 16
. Star : 50
. Pavilion Angle: 40.8
. Pavilion %: 43
. Lower Girdle %: 75
. Girdle: Very thin to Thin
. Measurements: 6.92-6.95X4.25
. Polish: Excellent
. Symmetry: Excellent
. Culet: None
. Fluorescence: None
$5917

THANKS!

 

[wen104]

#2 looks like the best deal to me.

 

[Ellen]

Date: 11/29/2007 4:53:30 PM
Author: wen104
#2 looks like the best deal to me.

Ditto!

 

[mintve]

yeah, #2 is my favorite too!

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Scratch #4 with the very thin girdle.

But what are the color and clarity of these stones? Are they all the same? You can''t compare them without knowing considering their influence on the pricing!

 

[mintve]

Date: 11/29/2007 8:06:48 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
Scratch #4 with the very thin girdle.

But what are the color and clarity of these stones? Are they all the same? You can''t compare them without knowing considering their influence on the pricing!

I thought that too about #4, but wanted to make sure I was correct.

Oops, sorry about the color and clarity...I thought they were listed. Here they are:

#1 I VS1
#2 I VS2
#3 I VS1
#4 I VS2

 

[Sparkalicious]

#2 and # 3 look good to me but #2 is probably a better value for you considering that the pricing is better since it is a VS2 stone instead of VS1. Once you get into the VS range, it''s likely that you won''t see any inclusions with the unaided eye, therefore, why pay more for something you won''t be able to see anyways.

Go for it!