| Author | Topic: Emerald Question |
|
EdiL rough rock Posts: 2 |
posted 03-26-2001 11:06 PM
David, Thanks for responding. Yes, I get your meaning. Would there be anything you would change about your 2A standard if price were no object? I seem to recall reading that your numbers were based upon a combination of best stone quality coupled with an eye towards cost. Or am I remembering incorrectly? Would you be more rigid about numbers if price were not even a consideration? I appreciate your input in particular, as I am using your standard to search for stones, and will continue to do so. Thanks again, Edward di Lamporecchio |
 | |
| |
| |
|
Cut Nut cut rock Posts: 72 |
posted 03-28-2001 05:48 PM
stick to the same thread or you wont get responses |
| |
| |
| |
|
lawmax cut rock Posts: 207 |
posted 03-28-2001 06:56 PM
EdiL, You can reach Dave at oldminer@gowebway.com |
| |
| |
| |