Hop to the new Forum
 
Author Topic:   Clarity Enhanced? good/bad/ugly?
DaBunt
rough rock

Posts: 4
From:London
Registered: Feb 2001

posted 02-21-2001 07:52 AM    
Hi,

I am looking for a diamond in the .9 to 1.2 range.

I get the impression that a good cut is very important....

Given that my budget is only $4500 I was thinking about a clarity enhanced diamond.

I understand what clarity enhanced means but does it really matter to the man in the street (me)?

Any comments on clarity enhanced diamonds?

The one I am looking at is Tolkowsky Ideal Cut with the following details :
Total Depth: 62.8
Table Width: 56%
Crown Height: 16%
Pavilion Depth: 43%
Girdle Thickness: Thin, Faceted

and scores the following :

Factor Grade
Brilliance Very Good
Fire Very Good
Scintillation Good
Spread
or diameter for weight Very Good
Total Visual Performance 3.4 - Very Good - Worth buying if the price is right

which seems good for a F color SI1 clarity 1.24 ct diamond?

Just this thing about clarity enhanced.
 

lawmax
cut rock

Posts: 179
From:
Registered: Jan 1900

posted 02-21-2001 08:29 AM    
Hi DaBunt,

You may want to take a look at these posts from a good diamond forum where experts and consumers discussed clarity enhanced diamonds.
http://www.diatalk.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=4084

Personally, if you are willing to buy over the internet from an American company, I think you can buy a more beautiful, non-enhanced diamond within your budget.

You may have to come down a bit in color, perhaps to a G, and go down to a .8 or .9 carat diamond. A better cut diamond may appear larger than a heavier, poorly cut diamond as the well-cut one reflects more light and has the appropriate diameter.

You should buy a stone with a GIA or AGS certificate for the best assurance that you are getting what you are paying for. Do a search here and see what your options are. Check out the tutorial as well.

Just my opinion,

lawmax

 

leonid
Administrator

Posts: 309
From:Toronto, Ontario
Registered: Jul 2000

posted 02-21-2001 09:56 AM    
DaBunt,

It looks like the diamond you described has EGL report. EGL has quite broad understanding of Tolkowsky proportions (see our tutorial). Real Tolkowsky proportions will score below 2 on the HCA.

leonid
 

StevL
cut rock

Posts: 77
From:South Carolina, USA
Registered: Jan 1900

posted 02-23-2001 10:44 PM    
I would suggest you purchase a diamond with either a GIA or AGS report. I would also say stay away from a clarity enhanced diamond. If budget is the problem, buy a smaller diamond or give in another area of the diamond. You shouls be able to purchase a very beautiful diamond in the budget you quoted above, and not be enhanced.

My 2 cents......

------------------

 

StevL
cut rock

Posts: 77
From:South Carolina, USA
Registered: Jan 1900

posted 02-23-2001 10:56 PM    
Test..... Just wanted to see if my signature appeared.

It may make a difference if people know I'm in the jewelry business, but then again, you guys know as much as most jewelers about diamonds.

Nice site, and friendly place.


------------------
StevL
www.demsjewelers.com
www.eightstar.com

[This message has been edited by StevL (edited 02-23-2001).]
 

leonid
Administrator

Posts: 309
From:Toronto, Ontario
Registered: Jul 2000

posted 02-23-2001 11:10 PM    
Thanks

 
lawmax
cut rock

Posts: 179
From:
Registered: Jan 1900

posted 02-24-2001 06:52 AM    
Thanks for all your time, Steve.


 

Cut Nut
cut rock

Posts: 46
From:Melbourne Australia
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 02-24-2001 08:41 AM    
Hey mate!

if you are the man in the street - watch out you might get hit by a bus!

FF dias are not forever
your lady might prefer a cubic zirconia than a seriously tainted diamond.

if you want to go for budget - by a I1 diamond with a small visible mark, becaue in years to come the one you are talking about will look a lot worse.
Not a good choice!
garry
ps
The cut adviser is my thingy - just because a diamond is <1 does not mean it looks better than 1> 2.
Any stone under 2 is a fantastic stone and less than 3% of all diamonds ever cut!

 



 
Hop to the new Forum
 
Í