![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Either of these or keep looking? |
![]() |
| P: 10/15/2003 9:02:06 PM | |
|
icelovr Cut Rock Total Posts: 131 Last Post: 8/18/2004 Member Since: 8/28/2003 |
#1 - 2.03 round, SI1 - G 8.20-8.35x4.95 depth - 59.8 table 56 thin - faceted pol- VG, symm - VG pav. angle - 39.7 - 41.0 pav. depth - 41.40-42.5 crown angle - 33.8-35.0 crown height - 14.2-15.10 culet - none #2 - 2.00 round, SI1 - G 8.17-8.23x4.93 depth - 60.1 table - 57 thin - med - faceted pol - EX, symm - EX pav angle - 40.7 pav depth - 42.6 crown angle - 33.7 crown height - 14.9 culet - none which do you suggest....
|
| Posted: 10/15/2003 9:02:06 PM | |
![]() |
There are 8 replies to this message. There are 8 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 10/15/2003 9:13:33 PM | |
brandi2003 Rough Rock Total Posts: 5 Last Post: 10/15/2003 Member Since: 10/15/2003 |
I would pick 2. there is not much difference in size. One could probably not tell by looking at it, however #2 seems a better quality
|
| Posted: 10/15/2003 9:13:33 PM | |
| P: 10/15/2003 11:04:14 PM | |
|
Mikesgirl Cut Rock Total Posts: 348 Last Post: 12/9/2003 Member Since: 8/30/2003 |
Number 2 is far superior for what you have shown us. 0.7 on HCA (4.0 for #1). 2 has a medium girdle rather than thin; 1 is pretty significantly out of round. I'd go for 2, assuming it is eye clean.
"Where ever you go, there you are." |
| Posted: 10/15/2003 11:04:14 PM | |
| P: 10/16/2003 2:36:05 AM | |
|
Mara Ideal Rock Total Posts: 27,922 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 10/30/2002 |
Definitely not the first one...that HCA score is frightening. EX/EX for the second stone, a more symmetrical stone in diameter and the fact that the angles seem more inline would make me vote for that one...plus yes the girdle is better than stone #1.
I would go with #2 as well--or keep looking and keep that one in mind. Though a .7 HCA is pretty darn good.
________________________________ |
| Posted: 10/16/2003 2:36:05 AM | |
| P: 10/16/2003 8:04:16 AM | |
|
magna2 Cut Rock Total Posts: 319 Last Post: 2/9/2004 Member Since: 9/22/2003 |
Go with No. 2 if you are deciding between the two. The numbers on No. 1 does not paint a pretty picture.
|
| Posted: 10/16/2003 8:04:16 AM | |
| P: 10/16/2003 8:45:03 AM | |
fire&ice Ideal Rock Total Posts: 7,827 Last Post: 3/30/2009 Member Since: 7/22/2002 |
---------------- Ditto here! I was thinking the same thing - but how did the stone get a vg for symmetry? Which lab graded the stones?
|
| Posted: 10/16/2003 8:45:03 AM | |
| P: 10/16/2003 9:20:55 AM | |
Giangi Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,530 Last Post: 10/29/2006 Member Since: 1/23/2003 |
I'd go for #2 too, assuming it's eye-clean.
_____________ |
| Posted: 10/16/2003 9:20:55 AM | |
| P: 10/16/2003 11:53:28 AM | |
|
aljdewey Ideal Rock Total Posts: 8,236 Last Post: 2/11/2008 Member Since: 11/25/2002 |
Absolutely #2 in my book!
_____________________ |
| Posted: 10/16/2003 11:53:28 AM | |
| P: 10/16/2003 7:06:30 PM | |
|
icelovr Cut Rock Total Posts: 131 Last Post: 8/18/2004 Member Since: 8/28/2003 |
Thanks everyone - I too was leaning toward #2 - but the dealer said they were both equally as nice??!! - I'm not at all sure about Sarins w/ a range and the #'s didn't seem to me to work - so I'm glad to hear you all feel the same way - by the way these are both GIA certs - go figure - I've been told VG vs EX is just being too picky - of course this is from dealers, so I'm not really surprised. I think #2 might be sold - he's getting back to me. Thanks again for all the help - Kristi
|
| Posted: 10/16/2003 7:06:30 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives