![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
About to pull the trigger. Need help right away, please! |
![]() |
| P: 10/14/2003 3:52:28 PM | |
ebranger Rough Rock Total Posts: 13 Last Post: 11/11/2004 Member Since: 10/5/2003 |
How do these numbers from the sarin report look? Weight .081 carat Width 4.75 mm Length 6.22mm L/W 1.31 Total Depth 2.92 61.5% Pavil Depth 2.30 mm 48.4% Crown height 0.51 mm 10.7% Table size 3.17 mm 66.7% Girdle 0.8% Cutlet Offcenter 0.06 mm Table Offcenter 0.03 mm Table offcutlet 0.06 mm
Eric |
| Posted: 10/14/2003 3:52:28 PM | |
![]() |
There are 4 replies to this message. There are 4 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 10/14/2003 4:02:40 PM | |
|
Mara Ideal Rock Total Posts: 27,897 Last Post: 11/21/2009 Member Since: 10/30/2002 |
First off..I assume you mean .81c and not .08c right?
Second, what type of stone is this? A fancy by the looks of it.
Run it through the DIY Cut Grading tool at www.gemappraisers.com to get more information. If it scores 1A, 1B, 2A or 2B..it should be good, I would stay away from anything with 3 or 4 rating.
Good luck!
________________________________ |
| Posted: 10/14/2003 4:02:40 PM | |
| P: 10/14/2003 4:10:43 PM | |
ebranger Rough Rock Total Posts: 13 Last Post: 11/11/2004 Member Since: 10/5/2003 |
Oh, yes, sorry. It is a 0.81 carate emerald cut (getting so nervous I can't even type now. ![]() The diamond rates as a 2B on gemappraiser.com. My only concern is that the GIA report had a rating of 1A on the table size, the sarin gives a rating of 2B. Also, the crown height on the sarin is a 3A. Girdle thickness, total depth %, and polish/symmetry were all rated as a 1A. So, nothing here that anyone feels I should be alarmed about? Eric |
| Posted: 10/14/2003 4:10:43 PM | |
| P: 10/14/2003 4:12:58 PM | |
|
Mara Ideal Rock Total Posts: 27,897 Last Post: 11/21/2009 Member Since: 10/30/2002 |
What was the difference between the table from the GIA and then the Sarin? It shouldnt be THAT significant? Post the #'s.
________________________________ |
| Posted: 10/14/2003 4:12:58 PM | |
| P: 10/14/2003 4:21:51 PM | |
ebranger Rough Rock Total Posts: 13 Last Post: 11/11/2004 Member Since: 10/5/2003 |
The table on the GIA was 63%. On the sarin, it's 66.7%. I'm a little nervous that this was being sold through whiteflash as an "ideal cut." Looking at these numbers, it looks like a very nice cut, but I don't think it qualifies as an ideal. The price is $2874. I'm comfortable with the price and the cut IF it seems like a reasonable cost. If I'm paying for an ideal cut and getting less, I'm not as comfortable. Any opinions? Eric |
| Posted: 10/14/2003 4:21:51 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives