![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Final Decision |
![]() |
| P: 9/4/2003 9:09:06 AM | |
One Diamond Rough Rock Total Posts: 13 Last Post: 10/1/2003 Member Since: 8/21/2003 |
Here are the two choices. Let me know which one you guys think is a better value. I do believe ring #2 is a better stone but it is a bit more in cost because of that. Ok, here they are! #1 AGS000 1.05 VS1 G (6.52-6.55 X 4.02mm) Depth - 61.6% Table - 57% Crown Deg - 34.4 Pavilion Deg - 40.9 #2 AGS000 (Heart & Arrow) 1.07 VS1 G (6.63-6.68 X 4.01mm) Depth - 60.3% Table - 56% Crown Deg - 34.1 Pavilion Deg - 40.7 * Both have Inert (Negligible) florescence * Ring #2 is 14% more expensive (May be able to get ring #1 for even cheaper; Ring #2 not moving on price) Thanks so much! Thanks James for your help already! Keep me posted.
|
| Posted: 9/4/2003 9:09:06 AM | |
![]() |
There are 2 replies to this message. There are 2 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 9/4/2003 11:50:54 AM | |
|
dbretton Rough Rock Total Posts: 50 Last Post: 9/4/2003 Member Since: 12/1/2002 |
Buy them both. Compare them, then keep the nicer one, provided that the beauty outweighs the cost differential. -Dennis |
| Posted: 9/4/2003 11:50:54 AM | |
| P: 9/4/2003 11:53:11 AM | |
hoorray Cut Rock Total Posts: 138 Last Post: 4/10/2004 Member Since: 5/16/2003 |
Agreed! They both score well on the HCA, so pick whichever one looks best vis-a-vie the price to you.
|
| Posted: 9/4/2003 11:53:11 AM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives