Engagement Rings Direct
 

Diamond Jewelry Forums   Picture Gallery   Video Gallery   Journal

   
 Search Posted Today Most Active Help   
 » Home »  » Diamond Prices and Grading »  » RockyTalky »  » I might buy this radiant


  

 I might buy this radiant

P:  5/23/2008 3:06:00 PM  
kmick
kmick

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 98
Last Post: 6/18/2008
Member Since: 5/12/2008
 

Hey Lorelei, I know I'm breakign the rules by doing a new post.  But i thought the last one was getting a little long...plus i was hoping to get some more responses.


I am giving this radiant serious thought.  its a little more than i want to spend but i think its a nicer diamond than the other one although its measurements are 6.05 X 6.06 as opposed to 6.48X6.28.

will post additional info...

thanks for feeback!
kevin

 



Posted:  5/23/2008 3:06:00 PM

 There are 14 replies to this message.  There are 14 replies on this page.

P: 5/23/2008 3:06:30 PM
kmick
kmick

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 98
Last Post: 6/18/2008
Member Since: 5/12/2008
 
aset
 

 

Posted:  5/23/2008 3:06:30 PM
P: 5/23/2008 3:12:37 PM
Lorelei
Lorelei

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 34,257
Last Post: 11/25/2009
Member Since: 4/30/2005
 
Date: 5/23/2008 3:06:00 PM
Author:kmick

Hey Lorelei, I know I'm breakign the rules by doing a new post. But i thought the last one was getting a little long...plus i was hoping to get some more responses.



I am giving this radiant serious thought. its a little more than i want to spend but i think its a nicer diamond than the other one although its measurements are 6.05 X 6.06 as opposed to 6.48X6.28.

will post additional info...

thanks for feeback!
kevin


Kevin, you aren't breaking any rules - please don't worry - it was just that it is easier for us to follow one thread, but that is fine that you have done a new one if you want to make a fresh start!









Nothing is more sacred as the bond between horse and rider...no other creature can ever become so emotionally close to a human as a horse. When a horse dies, the memory lives on because an enormous part of his owner's heart, soul, very existence dies also...but that can never be laid to rest, it is not meant to be...
- Stephanie M Thorn

Posted:  5/23/2008 3:12:37 PM
P: 5/23/2008 3:13:37 PM
kmick
kmick

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 98
Last Post: 6/18/2008
Member Since: 5/12/2008
 
sarin
 

 

Posted:  5/23/2008 3:13:37 PM
P: 5/23/2008 3:14:17 PM
kmick
kmick

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 98
Last Post: 6/18/2008
Member Since: 5/12/2008
 
Date: 5/23/2008 3:12:37 PM
Author: Lorelei

Date: 5/23/2008 3:06:00 PM
Author:kmick


Hey Lorelei, I know I'm breakign the rules by doing a new post. But i thought the last one was getting a little long...plus i was hoping to get some more responses.




I am giving this radiant serious thought. its a little more than i want to spend but i think its a nicer diamond than the other one although its measurements are 6.05 X 6.06 as opposed to 6.48X6.28.

will post additional info...

thanks for feeback!
kevin


Kevin, you aren't breaking any rules - please don't worry - it was just that it is easier for us to follow one thread, but that is fine that you have done a new one if you want to make a fresh start!
well what do you think of this one??

Posted:  5/23/2008 3:14:17 PM
P: 5/23/2008 3:34:10 PM
kmick
kmick

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 98
Last Post: 6/18/2008
Member Since: 5/12/2008
 

 Report: GIA
. Shape: Radiant
. Carat: 1.32
. Depth %: 66.3
. Table %: 65
. Girdle: STK
. Measurements: 6.06-6.05X4.01
. Polish: Very Good
. Symmetry: Excellent
. Culet: None
. Fluorescence: None


 

Posted:  5/23/2008 3:34:10 PM
P: 5/23/2008 4:14:29 PM
rob09
rob09

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 640
Last Post: 10/26/2009
Member Since: 2/6/2008
 
Kmick - not to be rude - but it seems to me that we are back at square one. The stones that you have found fit nicely the seemingly "ideal" proportions/numbers for a radiant and therefore have a higher likelihood of looking nice "in person" (and of making you happy since you put a lot of value on numbers). The reason why you are not getting more answers is that there is just not more advice that would help you in selecting a stone. It is up to you to make a decision now and LOOK at the stones.
1. Find stones with good numbers/ASET --> you have found some
2. Do they fit YOUR ideal in terms of color?
3. Do they fit YOUR ideal in terms of overall size?
4. Do they fit YOUR ideal in terms of price?
If 2-4 are OK - then order the stone and look at it. Point one has been exhausted; points 2-3 are up to YOU (some people like different colors and shapes, i.e. square, rectangular etc.). Number 4: While I would say that you can expect to pay anywhere between 5-8K for a radiant around 1.3ct, it depends on whether it is an "original" one or not. By the time you decide that you have found one that is in the ballpark of what you would be willing to pay, I would go for it, given that finding a nice radiant can be a lot of work!
Best of luck!

Posted:  5/23/2008 4:14:29 PM
P: 5/23/2008 8:18:43 PM
NeverEndingUpgrade
NeverEndingUpgrade

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,537
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 10/3/2007
 
Pretty. Are you going to take the plunge?

Posted:  5/23/2008 8:18:43 PM
P: 5/24/2008 4:47:05 AM
Lorelei
Lorelei

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 34,257
Last Post: 11/25/2009
Member Since: 4/30/2005
 
It looks good, which do you prefer between this diamond and the other one?









Nothing is more sacred as the bond between horse and rider...no other creature can ever become so emotionally close to a human as a horse. When a horse dies, the memory lives on because an enormous part of his owner's heart, soul, very existence dies also...but that can never be laid to rest, it is not meant to be...
- Stephanie M Thorn

Posted:  5/24/2008 4:47:05 AM
P: 5/24/2008 5:20:18 PM
kmick
kmick

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 98
Last Post: 6/18/2008
Member Since: 5/12/2008
 
Date: 5/24/2008 4:47:05 AM
Author: Lorelei
It looks good, which do you prefer between this diamond and the other one?
well tracy said this one has a lot more fire, however the dimensions arent quite as big.  but this one fits my numerics/stats as well so im thinking i like this one. 

i had her order in one more that looks kind of nice too, little less expensive than this one.  so im thinking this one right now however im still interested in this other one.

Posted:  5/24/2008 5:20:18 PM
P: 5/24/2008 5:23:07 PM
kmick
kmick

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 98
Last Post: 6/18/2008
Member Since: 5/12/2008
 
Date: 5/23/2008 4:14:29 PM
Author: rob09
Kmick - not to be rude - but it seems to me that we are back at square one. The stones that you have found fit nicely the seemingly 'ideal' proportions/numbers for a radiant and therefore have a higher likelihood of looking nice 'in person' (and of making you happy since you put a lot of value on numbers). The reason why you are not getting more answers is that there is just not more advice that would help you in selecting a stone. It is up to you to make a decision now and LOOK at the stones.
1. Find stones with good numbers/ASET --> you have found some
2. Do they fit YOUR ideal in terms of color?
3. Do they fit YOUR ideal in terms of overall size?
4. Do they fit YOUR ideal in terms of price?
If 2-4 are OK - then order the stone and look at it. Point one has been exhausted; points 2-3 are up to YOU (some people like different colors and shapes, i.e. square, rectangular etc.). Number 4: While I would say that you can expect to pay anywhere between 5-8K for a radiant around 1.3ct, it depends on whether it is an 'original' one or not. By the time you decide that you have found one that is in the ballpark of what you would be willing to pay, I would go for it, given that finding a nice radiant can be a lot of work!
Best of luck!
robo - no you're wrong the last stone had a really low crown height and isnt as firey as this one.  so really only one has really fit the numbers.  im not a diamond expert like you guys so i like to get feedback before i take this major plunge and want it to be as perfect as can be!!

thanks for the advice, it is appreciated.

kevin

Posted:  5/24/2008 5:23:07 PM
P: 5/24/2008 6:41:05 PM
coda72
coda72

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,096
Last Post: 11/21/2009
Member Since: 3/1/2005
 
After seeing the pics of both radiants you're considering I don't think this one looks any better to me than the one you posted in the other thread.  I don't know what the difference in cost is, but to me I just wouldn't pay more for this diamond just because the crown height is higher.  Also, for some reason this diamond is appearing smaller than it should be.  I have a 1.03 carat radiant that's 6.07x5.66, so to me a 1.32 carat diamond should be bigger than 6.06x6.05.  In the end it's your decision, and you should go with the one you like better, but I know I would buy the other stone over this one.

Posted:  5/24/2008 6:41:05 PM
P: 5/26/2008 12:59:37 PM
kmick
kmick

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 98
Last Post: 6/18/2008
Member Since: 5/12/2008
 
Date: 5/24/2008 6:41:05 PM
Author: coda72
After seeing the pics of both radiants you're considering I don't think this one looks any better to me than the one you posted in the other thread. I don't know what the difference in cost is, but to me I just wouldn't pay more for this diamond just because the crown height is higher. Also, for some reason this diamond is appearing smaller than it should be. I have a 1.03 carat radiant that's 6.07x5.66, so to me a 1.32 carat diamond should be bigger than 6.06x6.05. In the end it's your decision, and you should go with the one you like better, but I know I would buy the other stone over this one.


Thanks for the feedback Coda.  She is ordering in one more diamond.  What are your initial thoughts on this one?  It is basically down to the three ive mentioned (the one you sent, the other you just gave feedback on, and this one).



http://www.whiteflash.com/radiant/Radiant-cut-diamond-934725.htm

Posted:  5/26/2008 12:59:37 PM
P: 5/27/2008 2:02:38 AM
krisvrn
krisvrn

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 611
Last Post: 11/8/2009
Member Since: 11/15/2007
 
very nice diamond

Posted:  5/27/2008 2:02:38 AM
P: 5/27/2008 1:01:30 PM
kmick
kmick

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 98
Last Post: 6/18/2008
Member Since: 5/12/2008
 
Date: 5/27/2008 2:02:38 AM
Author: krisvrn
very nice diamond

which one?


also what do you guys think of these?  im thinking the one above is too far out of my price range.

http://www.whiteflash.com/radiant/Radiant-cut-diamond-1016321.htm
http://www.whiteflash.com/radiant/Radiant-cut-diamond-804068.htm


 

Posted:  5/27/2008 1:01:30 PM

 Previous Page Next Page 
« Is this a good diamond? Specs inside «» ring resizing question »

Jump to:



Contact Us  |  Back Home  |  Privacy Statement  |  Forum Agreement  |  Forum Policies

Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 Message forum software powered by  the Ideal BB

IdealBB Badge


Pricescope - Knowledge - Diamond Prices - Tools - Resources - About

© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives