Engagement Rings Direct
 

Diamond Jewelry Forums   Picture Gallery   Video Gallery   Journal

   
 Search Posted Today Most Active Help   
 » Home »  » Diamond Prices and Grading »  » RockyTalky »  » Anyone know about MSID diamonds?


  

 Anyone know about MSID diamonds?

P:  4/25/2008 3:06:50 PM  
Ty Cobb
Ty Cobb

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 119
Last Post: 9/18/2009
Member Since: 5/4/2007
 
http://www.robbinsbros.com/msid/default.asp

That is the link to the diamonds.  Any one in the industry know anything about what they are claiming?

 


Disclaimer: The above comments are the deranged thoughts of a hopeless romantic who has been brainwashed by celluloid dreams in the form of Sabrina, Breakfast at Tiffany's, Father of the Bride, My Fair Lady, and other horrendously trashy happy ending nonesense filled movies. If you are offended by them, you take yourself way too seriously and need to be locked in a room with the Easter Bunny, Santa Clause, the Tooth Fairy, and lots of helium
Posted:  4/25/2008 3:06:50 PM

 There are 11 replies to this message.  There are 11 replies on this page.

P: 4/25/2008 4:47:30 PM
JulieN
JulieN

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 7,145
Last Post: 11/22/2009
Member Since: 7/25/2005
 
there are other diamonds that max out Gemex.

hated the amateur presentation.

Posted:  4/25/2008 4:47:30 PM
P: 5/2/2008 6:44:00 PM
ediemk
ediemk

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 2
Last Post: 5/6/2008
Member Since: 5/2/2008
 
I actually bought an MSID diamond from Robbins Brothers about 2 weeks ago. I am contemplating taking it back after researching prices on this site and weighing the benefits of the "lifetime promise." I'm not sure that it is worth the premium you pay for it. The diamond, however, is gorgeous. I absolutely love it and am hesitant to part with it. I compared it to other stones side by side, and it does appear larger. I'll post a pic sometime later.

Posted:  5/2/2008 6:44:00 PM
P: 5/2/2008 8:37:39 PM
denverappraiser
denverappraiser

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 4,614
Last Post: 11/22/2009
Member Since: 7/21/2004
 
As far as I remember, I’ve never seen one but I did take a few minutes to look over their patent (6,990.833). I’m really surprised that they granted this. What they do that’s different from everyone else seems to be limited to a 23-30 degree crown and the related changes in the upper girdle and star facets. Am I missing something? Ok, it’s got a slightly flat crown. That’s unique enough to grant a patent? People have been cutting flat spready stones for decades. What’s different here?

Here's another one that got a patent with the revolutionary idea of being spready on BOTH the crown and pavilion.

Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA
Professional Appraisals in Denver

There's never a crowd when you go that extra mile.

Posted:  5/2/2008 8:37:39 PM
P: 5/3/2008 4:54:31 PM
DiaGem
DiaGem

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 3,927
Last Post: 11/21/2009
Member Since: 10/21/2004
 
Date: 4/25/2008 3:06:50 PM
Author:Ty Cobb
http://www.robbinsbros.com/msid/default.asp

That is the link to the diamonds. Any one in the industry know anything about what they are claiming?
Old news???
Prior art at its highest element???

**********************
>Y<

Yoram F.

Antique Diamond Gem
http://www.diagem.net/

"When it doesn't exist, design it..." Sir Henry Royce

Posted:  5/3/2008 4:54:31 PM
P: 5/4/2008 1:24:10 AM
Garry H (Cut Nut)
Garry H (Cut Nut)

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 11,579
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 8/16/2000
 
This is hilarious.

Anyone who has been involved with the US patent office knows by know it is a little like a headless chicken.

Here is the actual patent
http://www.google.com/patents?id=KCB3AAAAEBAJ&dq=faceted+circular+cut+diamond


It describes a BIC diamond that HCA predicted some 2 years before.

The stone is a traditional round brilliant with a shallow crown (25 to 27 degrees) and has a slightly deep pavilion (40.7-42 degrees) - this makes a spreadier cut with greater light return at the expense of fire.

The extra weight saving comes from a thin girdle (1-3%) which is a chipping / durability disaster in a shallow crown angled diamond for a ring - but great for earrings and pendants.

HCA stops at 28 degrees and raises warnings on thinner girdled diamonds as the crown angle gets lower. These stones would be dinged by HCA and any reasonable appraiser for usage in rings.

Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT

HCA and Ideal-scope developer

http://www.ideal-scope.com and
http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au

Posted:  5/4/2008 1:24:10 AM
P: 5/4/2008 1:46:53 AM
Garry H (Cut Nut)
Garry H (Cut Nut)

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 11,579
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 8/16/2000
 
Date: 5/2/2008 8:37:39 PM
Author: denverappraiser
As far as I remember, I’ve never seen one but I did take a few minutes to look over their patent (6,990.833). I’m really surprised that they granted this. What they do that’s different from everyone else seems to be limited to a 23-30 degree crown and the related changes in the upper girdle and star facets. Am I missing something? Ok, it’s got a slightly flat crown. That’s unique enough to grant a patent? People have been cutting flat spready stones for decades. What’s different here?

Here's another one that got a patent with the revolutionary idea of being spready on BOTH the crown and pavilion.
i have seen some of what these people are doing Neil and it is very interesting. A lot of their focus is on very small pave stones
Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA
Professional Appraisals in Denver

Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT

HCA and Ideal-scope developer

http://www.ideal-scope.com and
http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au

Posted:  5/4/2008 1:46:53 AM
P: 5/6/2008 6:09:58 AM
QueenMum
QueenMum

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,971
Last Post: 10/28/2009
Member Since: 2/13/2003
 
Date: 5/4/2008 1:24:10 AM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
HCA stops at 28 degrees and raises warnings on thinner girdled diamonds as the crown angle gets lower. These stones would be dinged by HCA and any reasonable appraiser for usage in rings.
Even if the girdle is thick enough?


Stephan

Posted:  5/6/2008 6:09:58 AM
P: 5/6/2008 7:59:51 AM
Garry H (Cut Nut)
Garry H (Cut Nut)

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 11,579
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 8/16/2000
 
Date: 5/6/2008 6:09:58 AM
Author: QueenMum

Date: 5/4/2008 1:24:10 AM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
HCA stops at 28 degrees and raises warnings on thinner girdled diamonds as the crown angle gets lower. These stones would be dinged by HCA and any reasonable appraiser for usage in rings.
Even if the girdle is thick enough?
Check out the ultra thin girdle on their comparsions on the website QM

Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT

HCA and Ideal-scope developer

http://www.ideal-scope.com and
http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au

Posted:  5/6/2008 7:59:51 AM
P: 5/6/2008 9:16:58 AM
oldminer
oldminer

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 4,964
Last Post: 11/20/2009
Member Since: 9/4/2000
 
There is nothing new here, but the patent office seems to have rubber stamped something which was already known and potentially available for years.  The cut is "different" from a standard configuration, but just what GH has been telling us all about for quite a few years already. 

The MSID name is really a funny:  "Mr. Smith's Incredible Diamond".  Smith is a name commonly used as a ficticious name.  It very much fits the part it plays in what is being offered.  Buy it "if you love it" still applies.  Pay a fair price and no one will have much to criticize.  Apparently the MSID stone has a very nice appearance.

David S. Atlas

GG(GIA), ASG, Sr. Mbr. NAJA

www.datlas.com





Posted:  5/6/2008 9:16:58 AM
P: 5/6/2008 9:18:46 AM
denverappraiser
denverappraiser

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 4,614
Last Post: 11/22/2009
Member Since: 7/21/2004
 
The girdle measurement is described as a minimum, not a range or maximum, so the razor thin girdle isn’t required, it seems to be an option (and I agree it’s an undesirable one). In the patent they curiously measure girdle thickness as a ratio of the diameter, not of depth. Odd, but maybe that’s part of their ‘invention’ that allowed them to convince the patent examiner to grant the thing in the first place.

Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA
Professional Appraisals in Denver

There's never a crowd when you go that extra mile.

Posted:  5/6/2008 9:18:46 AM
P: 5/6/2008 4:05:26 PM
ediemk
ediemk

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 2
Last Post: 5/6/2008
Member Since: 5/2/2008
 
I took the diamond back!!  Went to Whiteflash and compared to ACA Hearts and Arrows.  The MSID didn't stand a chance!  It was amazing the difference in the brilliance.  I think it's kind of funny now that I thought it was so pretty before.  It looked absolutely dark and lifeless next to Brian Gavin's H&A diamonds.  Word to the wise...don't ever buy one of these unless you never plan on seeing another diamond in your life.  :) 

--A soon-to-be very satisfied ACA Hearts and Arrows owner

Posted:  5/6/2008 4:05:26 PM

 Previous Page Next Page 
« Is Leon at WF the Leon everybody here is talking about? «» seem like a good deal - is it? »

Jump to:



Contact Us  |  Back Home  |  Privacy Statement  |  Forum Agreement  |  Forum Policies

Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 Message forum software powered by  the Ideal BB

IdealBB Badge


Pricescope - Knowledge - Diamond Prices - Tools - Resources - About

© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives