The Facets Collection
 

Diamond Jewelry Forums   Picture Gallery   Video Gallery   Journal

   
 Search Posted Today Most Active Help   
 » Home »  » Diamond Prices and Grading »  » RockyTalky »  » Stone Height in Setting


  

 Stone Height in Setting

P:  7/15/2003 7:21:53 PM  
English Novice
English Novice

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 9
Last Post: 7/16/2003
Member Since: 6/11/2003
 
Dear All,

I was wondering what you all think about the height of a stone in its setting. I am considering getting a fairly large pear-shape for my girlfriend's engagement. However, I am always struck by how large diamonds often seem to be set quite high from the finger. Does this bother anyone else (females out there?).
Are there certain stones that can be set low / close to the finger?
Are there any settings for large pear shapes that would allow this?

Your help and opinions are greatly appreciated!

Many thanks,

English Novice
Posted:  7/15/2003 7:21:53 PM

 There are 12 replies to this message.  There are 12 replies on this page.

P: 7/15/2003 10:13:31 PM
lucy
lucy

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 55
Last Post: 8/7/2004
Member Since: 6/2/2002
 
hi
i just had my 3 carat set in a high setting with two side baguettes tapering up to it. I think if it was just the 3c by itself it might look high but with the side stones it looks good-i personally like that it's higher-makes the stone look more prominent and really draws the eye. I thought since it was so high i might be apt to bang it more on stuff but i find that since it is high i am more aware of it and more careful. i think it depends on the lifestyle-if i was more active-say a rock climber type, i would want it lower.

Posted:  7/15/2003 10:13:31 PM
P: 7/15/2003 10:52:04 PM
niceice
niceice

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,792
Last Post: 7/22/2008
Member Since: 1/29/2003
 
The height of the setting is dependent on the depth of the diamond... With a larger pear shape, the setting is likely to be high on the finger, but it depends on how the cagework and design of the ring is done... This 5.76 carat pear shape sits fairly low on Robin's finger because the cagework rests on the finger and the ring is built up with accents to run down the sides and balance the ring... It also helps that the pear shape is cut a little "spreadier" than most...

Todd L. Gray, President
NiceIce.com

Posted:  7/15/2003 10:52:04 PM
P: 7/16/2003 3:34:26 AM
Giangi
Giangi

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 2,530
Last Post: 10/29/2006
Member Since: 1/23/2003
 
Ouch! That's a serious ring! Strong blue?

_____________
Omnia Mea Mecum Porto.

Giangi

Posted:  7/16/2003 3:34:26 AM
P: 7/16/2003 7:07:32 AM
deborah
deborah

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 1
Last Post: 7/16/2003
Member Since: 5/28/2003
 
Personally, I like the high setting. Or at least medium-high. Low settings seem to be "hiding" from view.

Posted:  7/16/2003 7:07:32 AM
P: 7/16/2003 9:18:36 AM
jenntheten
jenntheten

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 52
Last Post: 6/23/2007
Member Since: 1/10/2003
 
I am by no means in the "big diamond class", but my 1.5 princess is set high (in my opinion) and I love it that way. After the first few days you get used to the height and I can't remember the last time I hit it on something---and my husband calls me "a bull in a china cabinet" if you know what I mean. I get compliments on the ring and SPECIFICALLY the height of it often! I think the person wearing the ring needs to be the once to decide this though----when we were shopping for settings, my then boyfriend was concerned about it, so I understand where you're coming from.

Posted:  7/16/2003 9:18:36 AM
P: 7/16/2003 10:38:47 AM
Hest88
Hest88

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 3,678
Last Post: 11/22/2009
Member Since: 1/22/2003
 
I like low-as-can-be settings, but then my tastes are rather conservative. It's really a woman's preference, so if you know she wants a pear in that size, buy it, set it in an inexpensive solitaire setting, then go with her to choose a permanent wedding set later.

Posted:  7/16/2003 10:38:47 AM
P: 7/16/2003 10:43:42 AM
niceice
niceice

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,792
Last Post: 7/22/2008
Member Since: 1/29/2003
 



----------------
On 7/16/2003 3:34:26 AM Giangi wrote:

Ouch! That's a serious ring! Strong blue?

----------------

The marquise is a 2.54 carat, D color with Distinct Blue... Good eyes... Don't read too much into the appearance of the diamonds based upon the pictures, we've yet to master the art of photographing jewelry

Todd L. Gray, President
NiceIce.com

Posted:  7/16/2003 10:43:42 AM
P: 7/16/2003 11:11:43 AM
jenntheten
jenntheten

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 52
Last Post: 6/23/2007
Member Since: 1/10/2003
 
I've asked this before and haven't seen an answer----what exactly does flourescence do the the appearance of a diamond????

Posted:  7/16/2003 11:11:43 AM
P: 7/16/2003 12:53:51 PM
English Novice
English Novice

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 9
Last Post: 7/16/2003
Member Since: 6/11/2003
 
JentheTen, try looking at these :

http://www.pricescope.com/tutor_fluor.asp
http://www.pricescope.com/idealbb/view.asp?topicID=1288&forumID=3&catID=&search=1&searchstring=&sessionID={CF1BFBF0-37C3-4CC6-B762-818DD98174F8}
http://www.pricescope.com/idealbb/view.asp?topicID=2702&forumID=3&catID=&search=1&searchstring=&sessionID={CF1BFBF0-37C3-4CC6-B762-818DD98174F8}

Posted:  7/16/2003 12:53:51 PM
P: 7/16/2003 2:11:32 PM
Boulder
Boulder

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 173
Last Post: 9/17/2003
Member Since: 5/5/2003
 
jenntheten, Also check out Jonathan's explanation on the Good Old Gold website: http://www.goodoldgold.com/fluorescence.htm

Posted:  7/16/2003 2:11:32 PM
P: 7/16/2003 2:25:10 PM
jenntheten
jenntheten

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 52
Last Post: 6/23/2007
Member Since: 1/10/2003
 
Thanks for all the input! You've been very helpful!

Posted:  7/16/2003 2:25:10 PM
P: 7/16/2003 4:05:10 PM
English Novice
English Novice

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 9
Last Post: 7/16/2003
Member Since: 6/11/2003
 



Rough Rock

Total Posts: 9


Thanks for all your help, everyone.

Sometimes I come across a setting that appears to have a 'hole' in the middle of the main body of the ring (see attached picture).
Am I right in assuming that this is to allow the 'bottom point' of the diamond to sit where the ring would normally be, thereby allowing a 'lower - set' diamond?

Thanks to you all,



 

 

Posted:  7/16/2003 4:05:10 PM

 Previous Page Next Page 
« GIA tour and out of round question «» Nice Ice Purchase Pic 1 »
Next Topics
Need your expert opinion Need advice on two radiants. cushette - pavillion faceting Maul Jewelers, Part Deux Which is warped? GIA tour and out of round question Help! Just bought ring on e-bay, too good to be true? Settings in England Selling an engagement ring .... Including Inclusions... Dumb Question??? White Gold Prongs - PLEASE REPLY Looking for tiffany display ring stone holders Good Quality Stone? Please help Three prong setting opinion Questions about asscher/square emerald cuts... EGL Los Angeles Nice Ice Purchase Pic 1 First Isee2 Screenshot i need you! About appraisels question about new diamond inclusion plotting HELP - need help with proportions - Buying tomorrow!! Am I over analyzing?? help! Royal Crown - X Prong, which did you choose! Help buying a ring Opinions on cut please! Is slightly less more? question 4 number-lovers...

Jump to:



Contact Us  |  Back Home  |  Privacy Statement  |  Forum Agreement  |  Forum Policies

Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 Message forum software powered by  the Ideal BB

IdealBB Badge


Pricescope - Knowledge - Diamond Prices - Tools - Resources - About

© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives