![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Small Culet |
![]() |
| P: 10/11/2000 11:58:00 AM | |
diamondvirg Rough Rock Total Posts: 1 Last Post: Unknown Member Since: 10/24/2000 |
What's the aesthetic implication of a small culet for a princess cut?
|
| Posted: 10/11/2000 11:58:00 AM | |
![]() |
There are 3 replies to this message. There are 3 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 10/11/2000 10:05:00 AM | |
|
StevL Ideal Rock Total Posts: 591 Last Post: 12/11/2007 Member Since: 1/1/2000 |
Your both right, but the cutter saved a ton of weight by just cutting it to be a princess cut. ------------------ Cheers, |
| Posted: 10/11/2000 10:05:00 AM | |
| P: 10/11/2000 11:37:00 AM | |
|
Pricescope Administrator Total Posts: 8,265 Last Post: 1/5/2008 Member Since: 1/1/2000 |
Hi Diamondvirg, Medium and smaller culet should not have any aesthetic effect since it won't be visible with the naked eye when viewed from the table. Only if culet is large, it will look like a hole or inclusion. Small culet shouldn't bother you at all Pricescope |
| Posted: 10/11/2000 11:37:00 AM | |
| P: 10/11/2000 11:54:00 AM | |
bacon Rough Rock Total Posts: 72 Last Post: 1/16/2004 Member Since: 8/16/2000 |
diamondvirg- leonid is right. The cutter retained a little extra weight from the original crystal by not closing the culet. By definition the small culet is not visible to the unaided eye (at 18 inches). So there is no aesthetic implication.
|
| Posted: 10/11/2000 11:54:00 AM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives