![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
First Two Candidates |
![]() |
| P: 8/8/2007 4:53:17 PM | |
|
makhro82 Rough Rock Total Posts: 59 Last Post: 11/6/2009 Member Since: 7/26/2007 |
Okay, I guess this ring this is really going to happen. Mark at ERD has sent over the first two contenders and I wanted to get the opinions of some fellow Pricescopers on which you would choose and why/why not..... Notice no report numbers are listed for all you naughty Pricescope lurkers, lol! Can't figure out how to get the PDF attached that shows where the inclusions are located. Report Type: GIA Diamond Grading Report Date of Issue: April 03, 2007 Round Brilliant Measurements: 6.64 - 6.72 x 4.03 mm Carat Weight: 1.10 Color Grade: H Clarity Grade: VS2 Cut Grade: Excellent Proportions: Depth: 60.3 % Table: 58 % Crown Angle: 33° Crown Height: 13 % Pavilion Angle: 41° Pavilion Depth: 43.5 % Star length: 50 % Lower Half: 80 % Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick, Faceted Culet: None Finish: Polish: Very Good Symmetry: Very Good Fluorescence: None Comments: Additional clouds are not shown. $5500 Report Type: GIA Diamond Grading Report Date of Issue: June 23, 2006 Round Brilliant Measurements: 6.74 - 6.81 x 4.08 mm Carat Weight: 1.14 Color Grade: H Clarity Grade: VS2 Cut Grade: Very Good Proportions: Depth: 60.2 % Table: 58 % Crown Angle: 35° Crown Height: 15 % Pavilion Angle: 40.2° Pavilion Depth: 42 % Star length: 55 % Lower Half: 80 % Girdle: Thin to Slightly Thick, Faceted Culet: None Finish: Polish: Very Good Symmetry: Very Good Fluorescence: None Comments: Pinpoints are not shown. $5900 I fell in love with the man and now the diamond. |
| Posted: 8/8/2007 4:53:17 PM | |
![]() |
There are 3 replies to this message. There are 3 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 8/8/2007 5:12:42 PM | |
|
Ellen Ideal Rock Total Posts: 22,894 Last Post: 11/6/2009 Member Since: 1/13/2006 |
I like the numbers on the first one better. Not liking the PA on the second, unless it's a typo.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| Posted: 8/8/2007 5:12:42 PM | |
| P: 8/8/2007 9:46:21 PM | |
|
diamondseeker2006 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 17,609 Last Post: 11/18/2009 Member Since: 1/11/2006 |
#1 doesn't exactly have ideal cut numbers either, but it at least gets an excellent instead of very good as the cut grade. I'd probably look further unless you have seen the stones in person and love them.
|
| Posted: 8/8/2007 9:46:21 PM | |
| P: 8/9/2007 5:15:19 AM | |
|
Lorelei Ideal Rock Total Posts: 34,253 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 4/30/2005 |
makhr, thanks for the giggle about naughty Pricescope lurkers * NPL's*!!!! I would say if Mark has called these in or selected them for you, see which he thinks is the best one, they may not have the most spot on numbers - but see what Mark says? If he reckons they have potential, then they must have possibilities. ![]() Nothing is more sacred as the bond between horse and rider...no other creature can ever become so emotionally close to a human as a horse. When a horse dies, the memory lives on because an enormous part of his owner's heart, soul, very existence dies also...but that can never be laid to rest, it is not meant to be... - Stephanie M Thorn |
| Posted: 8/9/2007 5:15:19 AM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives