![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
question about calculating carat weight |
![]() |
| P: 5/7/2003 4:45:07 PM | |
nycguy Rough Rock Total Posts: 46 Last Post: 8/26/2005 Member Since: 4/26/2002 |
is there some kind of program or formula that you can input height, width, depth, pav angl, girdle, crown angle, cutlet, and get the carat weight? thanks!
|
| Posted: 5/7/2003 4:45:07 PM | |
![]() |
There are 6 replies to this message. There are 6 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 5/7/2003 8:11:50 PM | |
|
DiamondExpert Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,243 Last Post: 6/20/2009 Member Since: 1/16/2003 |
A general formula for SRB's (Standard Round Brilliants) with 58-60% depth and med girdle is: Ct. = height(mm)X diameter(mm)2 X 0.0061. Variations of depth and/or girdle require a 1-5% fudge factor. For the fancy shapes things are a bit more complicated and the formulae are varied depending upon the Length:Width ratios. |
| Posted: 5/7/2003 8:11:50 PM | |
| P: 5/8/2003 1:26:28 AM | |
|
Garry H (Cut Nut) Ideal Rock Total Posts: 11,567 Last Post: 11/21/2009 Member Since: 8/16/2000 |
For most smaller round brilliants you can use lxwxd x .00625. The most accurate system is DiamCalc for all shapes and variations etc. Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT |
| Posted: 5/8/2003 1:26:28 AM | |
| P: 5/8/2003 12:53:45 PM | |
alice123 Rough Rock Total Posts: 3 Last Post: 5/8/2003 Member Since: 5/7/2003 |
great, thats helpful. does that formula only really hold true for very well cut stones or is it consistently accurate regardless of angle variation etc? thanks!
|
| Posted: 5/8/2003 12:53:45 PM | |
| P: 5/8/2003 2:43:57 PM | |
|
Garry H (Cut Nut) Ideal Rock Total Posts: 11,567 Last Post: 11/21/2009 Member Since: 8/16/2000 |
It is reasonable for a wide range, it includes a factor for average girdles which are thicker than on well cut stones.
Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT |
| Posted: 5/8/2003 2:43:57 PM | |
| P: 5/8/2003 5:21:56 PM | |
|
DancinGirl Cut Rock Total Posts: 424 Last Post: 10/4/2005 Member Since: 2/24/2003 |
Hey I never knew this little trick! Very cool! I just tried mine and it came out to be a 1.10 - and mine is a 1.07... not too bad of a difference there! ~*~ Dancin Girl ~*~ |
| Posted: 5/8/2003 5:21:56 PM | |
| P: 5/8/2003 6:57:43 PM | |
|
Garry H (Cut Nut) Ideal Rock Total Posts: 11,567 Last Post: 11/21/2009 Member Since: 8/16/2000 |
Yes DG ![]() It will give a higher weight for most stones over 1/2 ct. Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT |
| Posted: 5/8/2003 6:57:43 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives