![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
| Pages: 1 of 2: [1] 2 > |
|
![]() |
source/quality of non-branded stones |
![]() |
| P: 6/17/2007 5:45:55 PM | |
diasurfer Rough Rock Total Posts: 61 Last Post: 6/10/2008 Member Since: 6/15/2007 |
hi, I'm a first time poster to pricescope but this is not my first experience with diamonds. Here's issue I'm pondering now for an e-ring stone. I can't decide between going with a "branded" super ideal (that's what I did last time) or go with a reputable broker/jeweler. I have contacted one of the latter who has in stock a diamond "cut by the same cutter who produces Brand X". What I am wondering is, are these in some sense the "cast offs" of the branded cutter? Ones that may be GIA-Ex or AGS-0 but not the cream of the crop, hence unwilling to assign brand name? Even when the broker/jeweler has a good reputation, do they have access to the highest quality of cuts? Are there "independent" cutters who don't sell their own brand and supply the independent brokers/jewelers with stones that are as high a quality as what the well-known brands can? thanks for any input you can offer. |
| Posted: 6/17/2007 5:45:55 PM | |
![]() |
There are 33 replies to this message. There are 30 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 6/17/2007 5:52:56 PM | |
|
neatfreak Ideal Rock Total Posts: 13,455 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 2/17/2007 |
AGS-0 IS the cream of the crop. "Branded" stones are basically just an extra layer of marketing, which adds a lot of $ onto the cost of your stone. Doesn't mean they are any better. I assume you're looking for a round? If so, check out Whiteflash or Good Old Gold. They have an excellent selection of AGS0 stones, at very good prices. Their customer service is also impeccable.
|
| Posted: 6/17/2007 5:52:56 PM | |
| P: 6/17/2007 6:21:13 PM | |
diasurfer Rough Rock Total Posts: 61 Last Post: 6/10/2008 Member Since: 6/15/2007 |
thanks neatfreak, but really your suggestion reflects by question. WF or GOG? (I'm trying to keep from using particular names as examples). By "branded" you seem to imply I am thinking of something like Hearts on Fire. But take WhiteFlash for example. Brian the cutter goes through their stones and the best get the ACA brand. Those don't quite meet his standards get the "Expert Selection" label - still high quality cuts (good HCA numbers for example) but not quite the best they produce. Say they made their "Expert Selection" stones available to GOG (again, this is just hypothetical). Then GOG could sell a very nice stone for a nice price, but in this case it is not the best this cutter produces. Or are you suggesting that the ACA/Expert selection is just marketing? BTW, I know some broker/jewelers would say "not all AGS 000 are created alike". but I appreciate the input. |
| Posted: 6/17/2007 6:21:13 PM | |
| P: 6/17/2007 6:26:13 PM | |
|
neatfreak Ideal Rock Total Posts: 13,455 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 2/17/2007 |
Date: 6/17/2007 6:21:13 PM Author: diasurfer thanks neatfreak, but really your suggestion reflects by question. WF or GOG? (I'm trying to keep from using particular names as examples). By 'branded' you seem to imply I am thinking of something like Hearts on Fire. But take WhiteFlash for example. Brian the cutter goes through their stones and the best get the ACA brand. Those don't quite meet his standards get the 'Expert Selection' label - still high quality cuts (good HCA numbers for example) but not quite the best they produce. Say they made their 'Expert Selection' stones available to GOG (again, this is just hypothetical). Then GOG could sell a very nice stone for a nice price, but in this case it is not the best this cutter produces. Or are you suggesting that the ACA/Expert selection is just marketing? BTW, I know some broker/jewelers would say 'not all AGS 000 are created alike'. but I appreciate the input. Whiteflash DOES select their ACA stones as premium stones, but GOG doesn't get their stones from WF, so they theoretically get to "pick" their stones from the same initial bucket as WF as far as I know. So there is no reason that an AGS-0 stone from GOG would be any worse/better than a branded one from WF. Same thing with a HOF branded diamond because WF and GOG aren't selecting the HOF "rejects", they get to make their selection on their own. The easiest answer is that for an uneducated consumer, a "branded" stone from whereever is a safe bet for them. They will pay the extra price for the security in knowing that whichever one they select will be a great one. For someone with some diamond knowledge and experience, I do believe that you could find a stone just as nice that isn't branded. You just need to do a bit of searching.
|
| Posted: 6/17/2007 6:26:13 PM | |
| P: 6/17/2007 7:28:55 PM | |
|
kcoursolle Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,344 Last Post: 10/14/2009 Member Since: 1/21/2006 |
Whiteflash's line of "a cut above" diamonds are the most beautiful rounds I've ever seen and are about 1/2 the price of "hearts on fire" branded stones. No need to get a name brand when WF's stones are so well cut.
|
| Posted: 6/17/2007 7:28:55 PM | |
| P: 6/17/2007 7:33:08 PM | |
|
WorkingHardforSmallRewards Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,234 Last Post: 12/14/2008 Member Since: 6/6/2007 |
ACA is a branded stone and carries with it a premium no?
____________________________ |
| Posted: 6/17/2007 7:33:08 PM | |
| P: 6/17/2007 7:47:58 PM | |
|
kcoursolle Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,344 Last Post: 10/14/2009 Member Since: 1/21/2006 |
Date: 6/17/2007 7:33:08 PM Author: WorkingHardforSmallRewards ACA is a branded stone and carries with it a premium no? A very small premium relative to debeers or other name brands.
|
| Posted: 6/17/2007 7:47:58 PM | |
| P: 6/17/2007 8:08:24 PM | |
|
WorkingHardforSmallRewards Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,234 Last Post: 12/14/2008 Member Since: 6/6/2007 |
I don't know much about branded diamonds--as I don't really have any interest in paying extra for the namebrand--unless it was tiffany's-- but don't those big name brands also have a special group of cutters? I think that is what this thread was really about though, that the big name brands have a special trained crew of cutters. So do those cutters work exclusively for that name, and then the few stones that have slight errors get sent off to be sold to other people, or do they work for those name brands as well as other clients, meaning that all of those particular cutters' diamonds would be of the same quality, with a few not "labeled"? Does the ACA have an exclusive group of cutters? ____________________________ |
| Posted: 6/17/2007 8:08:24 PM | |
| P: 6/17/2007 11:26:43 PM | |
diasurfer Rough Rock Total Posts: 61 Last Post: 6/10/2008 Member Since: 6/15/2007 |
Yes, WorkingHard I think you caught the meaning of what I was trying to get at. I consider WF ACA a branded stone. [I know they are beautiful diamonds; I bought one 5 years ago]. What I was wondering is if ACA, 8*, SuperbCert, Infinity, etc. can offer better looking diamonds than can be bought from, say James Allen, GOG, NiceIce, etc., because they have "first dibs" on whatever the cutters of these super ideals produce. Again, was trying not to name names or compare specific brands, I just meant this in a general sense. The counter argument is that all of these sources are ultimately buying from the same cutters and there is nothing inherently to gain by going with one of the "brands" I listed. thanks |
| Posted: 6/17/2007 11:26:43 PM | |
| P: 6/17/2007 11:37:29 PM | |
|
WorkingHardforSmallRewards Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,234 Last Post: 12/14/2008 Member Since: 6/6/2007 |
My theory would be that some of the highest end names have got a select group of cutters that work for them exclusively. But knowing how the world works I bet that even then they occasionally bring in diamonds that are offered from other cutters that meet the proper proportions. But honestly now, everyone knows the numbers. If the cutter is able to do it, then its just a rock that has been cut the same as the master from one of the select namebrands, and surely there are more cutters able to do it just as well than there is demand from those high end names too employee. Which means that there should be a fair number of equally beautifully cut diamonds available via other avenues, and that can be verified with an AGS report and analysis of all the numbers and performance and comparing it to the requirements of those higher end name brands. but if anybody has any real knowledge lets find out! ____________________________ |
| Posted: 6/17/2007 11:37:29 PM | |
| P: 6/18/2007 2:31:28 AM | |
diasurfer Rough Rock Total Posts: 61 Last Post: 6/10/2008 Member Since: 6/15/2007 |
yes! yes! that's what I'm talking about WHFSM! how does this really work??? |
| Posted: 6/18/2007 2:31:28 AM | |
| P: 6/19/2007 3:01:52 PM | |
|
BrianTheCutter Cut Rock Total Posts: 146 Last Post: 12/19/2008 Member Since: 7/26/2002 |
Date: 6/18/2007 2:31:28 AM Author: diasurfer yes! yes! that's what I'm talking about WHFSM! how does this really work??? There are different channels and lines of distribution. Some are public. Others are very exclusive or volume-driven. Regardless, beware any seller making claims about secret access to ‘brand X.’ Brian Gavin |
| Posted: 6/19/2007 3:01:52 PM | |
| P: 6/19/2007 3:41:06 PM | |
diasurfer Rough Rock Total Posts: 61 Last Post: 6/10/2008 Member Since: 6/15/2007 |
hello Brian the Cutter, I recall a telephone conversation with you 5+ years ago about various ACA stones you had in stock - how it set my mind at ease. And now, thank you for taking the time to reply to this thread. I really thought it would generate more interest than it apparently has. For as much information as one can find on Pricescope, there is still much about the industry that goes on behind the curtains for the consumer. Namely, how distribution from rough suppliers, cutters, and vendors really works, in all its various forms. I appreciate you clarifying the process for Whiteflash/ACA. For the record, no one ever claimed to have secret access to Whiteflash/ACA stones. They claimed they had access to stones produced by the same cutter as produces "Brand X", which I will not name. I also regret that Good Old Gold's name got brought into this, even hypothetically. I have no knowledge of their access to diamonds and do not want to in any way suggest that their supply is inferior. thanks and aloha |
| Posted: 6/19/2007 3:41:06 PM | |
| P: 6/19/2007 5:05:36 PM | |
sep004 Rough Rock Total Posts: 9 Last Post: 8/2/2007 Member Since: 6/12/2007 |
Thank you for the informative post! I had been under the impression that there was a database of diamonds, of which some were of a superior cut. I thought this was why one GIA number would appear on several websites. I have been trying to figure out why the Whiteflash ACA diamonds are more expensive than the SC Round Ideal Cut H&A, and I guess it's because the WF diamonds are WF-exclusive. Thanks for clearing this up for all of us!
|
| Posted: 6/19/2007 5:05:36 PM | |
| P: 6/19/2007 6:20:06 PM | |
|
BrianTheCutter Cut Rock Total Posts: 146 Last Post: 12/19/2008 Member Since: 7/26/2002 |
You are welcome sep004. Your assumption was correct. Diamond suppliers list stones through a virtual database offered via many retail sites. Sellers with financial ability may also have selections they've purchased and own already, called an in-house inventory. The Pricescope sift allows you to differentiate by selecting all, or in-house. Brian Gavin |
| Posted: 6/19/2007 6:20:06 PM | |
| P: 6/19/2007 9:10:36 PM | |
|
strmrdr Ideal Rock Total Posts: 23,296 Last Post: 10/9/2009 Member Since: 11/1/2003 |
non-branded stones can and are in some cases as good as or better than branded stones. Depends on the stone itself and the skill of the vendor selecting and securing supply. A few vendors have turned to partnership deals like Brian has and for much the same reason. Some keep it secret some don't. Others offer brands that are manufacturer driven: Paul's dealer network being the most well known on PS. While WF offers a brand that is vendor driven among other stones. Others select goods from suppliers they have a long history with. Others buy and sell diamonds off of lists, some in house and some virtual. Some walk across the street, select and pick up their diamonds. Most vendors combine multiple methods to offer a wide array of goods and services. Some vendors are just fronts for the cutters to sell direct. Since GOG was mentioned I will say that GOG sells such a wide variety of goods that its impossible to put them in any one category. They secure inventory using all of the above methods except being a front for a big cutter. ........... Karl has joined the diamond trade and is now posting as Karl_K |
| Posted: 6/19/2007 9:10:36 PM | |
| P: 6/20/2007 1:12:32 AM | |
|
Rhino Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,865 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 3/29/2001 |
Hello Brian, Are you saying that nobody has access to Antwerp source that cuts the ACA's? Regards, Rhino |
| Posted: 6/20/2007 1:12:32 AM | |
| P: 6/20/2007 8:18:08 AM | |
|
Wink Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,032 Last Post: 11/17/2009 Member Since: 5/4/2001 |
Date: 6/17/2007 11:26:43 PM Author: diasurfer The counter argument is that all of these sources are ultimately buying from the same cutters and there is nothing inherently to gain by going with one of the 'brands' I listed. thanks This would be the fallacy in your argument. All of the sources you mention are NOT buying from the same cutters. Some of them may be, but definitely not all of them. Even if they were, the cutters will cut to the demands of the buyer (assuming a large enough quantity of diamonds are being bought), so buying from the same cutter does not necessarily mean buying the same quality of cut from the same cutter. All AGS 0 cut grade stones are going to be pretty extraordinary, but some few are going to be even better, having a little extra magic, but not being able to be rewarded for that magic with a better grade. Frankly, some AGS1's are going to have that same magic, but be harshly penalized for extremely minor polish or symmetry faults that do not affect the magic, just the grade. (The price will be affected though) GIA will give its top cut grade with polish and symmetry defects that will downgrade a stone from AGS, and frankly, without a microscope it is often impossible to see those defects, so perhaps GIA has chosen correctly on that issue. (Now if they could just get the actually visible portions of their grading to be more accurate, but that is another argument in a galaxy far far away {cue music and scroll dialog}) You task, should you choose to accept it, will be to discern which you are looking at. The advantage to a branded stone with super tight tolerances and standards is that someone who knows how to look at the stones with their eyes has already done that for you. If the comfort afforded by that extra 3 to 5% is not needed by you, then by all means grab the unbranded stone. Wink Wink Jones |
| Posted: 6/20/2007 8:18:08 AM | |
| P: 6/20/2007 12:42:51 PM | |
diasurfer Rough Rock Total Posts: 61 Last Post: 6/10/2008 Member Since: 6/15/2007 |
So O-be-Wink, should I just close my eyes, let go, and use the force? ;) thanks for contributing to the thread. I've never heard it expressed as 3-5% for the comfort factor of brand's expert set of eyes, but assuming those numbers are correct that sounds like a good way to put it. I've always been the iconoclastic type who goes out of his way to avoid name brands where possible, but I admit it's tougher in the case of online diamond buying. Part of me always wants to support the independent little guy. But numerous studies in all walks of life have shown how observer's position can affect their ability to be objective. Let's say I want a super ideal cut and have very specific limits on the other 3 c's, making the stone I want an uncommon one. Take three examples for how I could buy it. First guy has 50 diamonds before I ever came along. Assigns his own quality grade to each of those then offers them for sale with his brand. One happens to meet my criteria. Second guy has access to hundreds, finds out what I'm looking for, in the morning walks a couple of blocks to pick out 5 which meet my rough criteria, then picks one of super ideal quality and returns the rest that afternoon. Third guy has access to hundreds, sends off for 5, has them shipped, picks the super ideal quality and ships the rest back. Of the three guys, it takes the smallest leap of faith to think that the first guy was objective in judging the quality, and the largest leap of faith for the third guy, since he already knew what I was specifically looking for and has already invested time and perhaps money (?) to obtain a candidate. Of course, many are able to do this very thing judging by their excellent PS reputations, but I think it takes a greater leap of faith. And I guess making that plunge is what might save the buyer 3-5%. This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds. |
| Posted: 6/20/2007 12:42:51 PM | |
| P: 6/20/2007 1:58:56 PM | |
|
Wink Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,032 Last Post: 11/17/2009 Member Since: 5/4/2001 |
Date: 6/20/2007 12:42:51 PM Author: diasurfer So O-be-Wink, should I just close my eyes, let go, and use the force? ;) Not at all sure about the force, but positive about using not closing the eyes. thanks for contributing to the thread. I've never heard it expressed as 3-5% for the comfort factor of brand's expert set of eyes, but assuming those numbers are correct that sounds like a good way to put it. I've always been the iconoclastic type who goes out of his way to avoid name brands where possible, but I admit it's tougher in the case of online diamond buying. Part of me always wants to support the independent little guy. But numerous studies in all walks of life have shown how observer's position can affect their ability to be objective. Of course I am speaking about vendors here such as WhiteFlash and Infinity, as well as others previously mentioned who are in that price range, not big time advertising vendors such as Hof which have much higher markups, nor EightStar which has much higher costs. Let's say I want a super ideal cut and have very specific limits on the other 3 c's, making the stone I want an uncommon one. Take three examples for how I could buy it. First guy has 50 diamonds before I ever came along. Assigns his own quality grade to each of those then offers them for sale with his brand. One happens to meet my criteria. Second guy has access to hundreds, finds out what I'm looking for, in the morning walks a couple of blocks to pick out 5 which meet my rough criteria, then picks one of super ideal quality and returns the rest that afternoon. Third guy has access to hundreds, sends off for 5, has them shipped, picks the super ideal quality and ships the rest back. Of the three guys, it takes the smallest leap of faith to think that the first guy was objective in judging the quality, and the largest leap of faith for the third guy, since he already knew what I was specifically looking for and has already invested time and perhaps money (?) to obtain a candidate. Of course, many are able to do this very thing judging by their excellent PS reputations, but I think it takes a greater leap of faith. And I guess making that plunge is what might save the buyer 3-5%. This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds. That may well be true, but in my opinion the ameteur buyer is probably better off paying the slight premium for the piece of mind. If the premium was 40 to 50% then I would think it better to do his homework and learn how to "find the real deal". I had not seen Brian's comments earlier, as I answered an earlier comment and had to immediately leave the computer for some hours, but what he has to say is VERY valid. There are often people who claim to be or do something that they are not or do not. It is your job in your quest for the illusive absolute least expensive finest diamond in the known universe to accurately determine what is genuine, and what is puffery. Not an easy task, especially considering that so very very many in the trade do not really understand it either. Wink Jones |
| Posted: 6/20/2007 1:58:56 PM | |
| P: 6/20/2007 5:27:32 PM | |
diasurfer Rough Rock Total Posts: 61 Last Post: 6/10/2008 Member Since: 6/15/2007 |
From Wink: your quest for the illusive absolute least expensive finest diamond in the known universe I love it! the quest for the holy grail! it's the fun part! much more fun than trying to pick a setting. ughhh! |
| Posted: 6/20/2007 5:27:32 PM | |
| P: 6/20/2007 10:32:09 PM | |
|
WorkingHardforSmallRewards Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,234 Last Post: 12/14/2008 Member Since: 6/6/2007 |
Hey Brian, first I want to say I wish I had known your name was Brian when I was shopping. Then I could have a diamond cut (organization) by Brian, her husband would be named brian and she would be wearing a Brian knox band. That would be pretty nice. But, to the real question, maybe it was up there and I missed it, but do you make all of your cutters sign contracts saying that they will not cut for anyone else? or do they have days off and time off where they could theoretically cut for someone else if they wanted to make some extra money? Personally I don't REALLY care about the cutter I care about the cut(Of course I am astounded by your and other master cutter's skills though). But it would be nice to know. Also, do you ever higher cutters for specifically short periods of time as a sort of independent contractor, or take any stones from cutters that approach you and demonstrate the quality of the cut to you, and then label accordingly? I imagine no to both, but It would be interesting as well. ____________________________ |
| Posted: 6/20/2007 10:32:09 PM | |
| P: 6/21/2007 11:01:14 AM | |
|
Paul-Antwerp Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,908 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 9/3/2002 |
Going back to the original question, if you have the contact details, I would contact the cutter and present him with the claim of the retailer. As an example, I once got a question of a Canadian consumer, to whom an Infinity-stone was presented by a retailer, unknown to us. After checking details of the stone, we could inform the consumer that this stone was definitely not cut by us. Unfortunately, it is impossible to control all sales-talk at the counter of every retailer in the world. Luckily, in our particular case, a consumer can always ask for a double-check from our side. Live long, Paul Slegers |
| Posted: 6/21/2007 11:01:14 AM | |
| P: 6/21/2007 1:58:24 PM | |
|
Rhino Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,865 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 3/29/2001 |
Reading Brian’s post again I’d like to make a clarification and apology. Since the GOG name has been brought up in this thread a few times and Brian’s reference to the growing of one vendor’s Pinocchio nose I made the assumption that he was referring to GOG which I should not have done. Why? I don’t advertise who my sources are to our clients so for that I apologize in my assumption. What Brian said is indeed true though. There are large manufacturers who will cut product for one distributor exclusive of others. In fact there are diamonds we are distributors (and will be as we are working on some new projects) of which come from certain manufactures who do not and will not supply to other vendors on this board. Hope that helps.
Rhino |
| Posted: 6/21/2007 1:58:24 PM | |
| P: 6/21/2007 2:00:15 PM | |
|
Rhino Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,865 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 3/29/2001 |
Date: 6/21/2007 11:01:14 AM Author: Paul-Antwerp Going back to the original question, if you have the contact details, I would contact the cutter and present him with the claim of the retailer. As an example, I once got a question of a Canadian consumer, to whom an Infinity-stone was presented by a retailer, unknown to us. After checking details of the stone, we could inform the consumer that this stone was definitely not cut by us. Unfortunately, it is impossible to control all sales-talk at the counter of every retailer in the world. Luckily, in our particular case, a consumer can always ask for a double-check from our side. Live long, Amen to that Paul. There are a lot of stores that make these claims. We see it all the time. And this is not counting all the manufacturers who claim to cut true H&A's that have wonky patterns. All the best, Rhino |
| Posted: 6/21/2007 2:00:15 PM | |
| P: 6/21/2007 2:02:53 PM | |
|
JohnQuixote Ideal Rock Total Posts: 5,212 Last Post: 5/24/2008 Member Since: 9/9/2004 |
Date: 6/20/2007 10:32:09 PM Author: WorkingHardforSmallRewards Hey Brian, first I want to say I wish I had known your name was Brian when I was shopping. Then I could have a diamond cut (organization) by Brian, her husband would be named brian and she would be wearing a Brian knox band. That would be pretty nice.
John |
| Posted: 6/21/2007 2:02:53 PM | |
| P: 6/21/2007 2:53:57 PM | |
|
JohnQuixote Ideal Rock Total Posts: 5,212 Last Post: 5/24/2008 Member Since: 9/9/2004 |
Date: 6/21/2007 1:58:24 PM Author: Rhino Reading Brian’s post again I’d like to make a clarification and apology. Since the GOG name has been brought up in this thread a few times and Brian’s reference to the growing of one vendor’s Pinocchio nose I made the assumption that he was referring to GOG which I should not have done. Why? I don’t advertise who my sources are to our clients so for that I apologize in my assumption. Thanks Rhino. We don’t want this to be misconstrued either. To be clear, Brian’s comments were not aimed at GOG. Their name appearing in this thread had nothing to do with the content of his post. John |
| Posted: 6/21/2007 2:53:57 PM | |
| P: 6/21/2007 3:01:43 PM | |
|
Wink Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,032 Last Post: 11/17/2009 Member Since: 5/4/2001 |
I see some good things coming out of this thread, including the fact that many diamonds may come from the same cutter, but may not be cut to the same standards. In the case of ACA, while there may be other diamonds cut to similar proportions that may in fact be good enough to be ACA, they are not and can not be ACA until Brian himself selects them. Brian is the brand owner and defender of ACA and no stone can be an ACA without his personal blessing. There is only one place in the world to buy an ACA and that is from the company Whiteflash. (Excluding of course the secondary market.) Houses like WhiteFlash and Infinity choose to represent that select portion of the market representing a fraction of 1% of the diamonds sold. That they will be very protective of their brands is only natural. That they should receive a small premium for the perfectly beautiful stones that they have rejected as not being good enough for their brand is also only natural. Before the internet information explosion that premium might have been much higher, but coincidentally because of the internet information explosion there is a much greater demand for that fraction of 1% of diamonds. Wink Wink Jones |
| Posted: 6/21/2007 3:01:43 PM | |
| P: 6/21/2007 3:41:13 PM | |
diasurfer Rough Rock Total Posts: 61 Last Post: 6/10/2008 Member Since: 6/15/2007 |
I would like to emphasize that the vendor who told me "same cutter as produces Brand X" was not GOG, James Allen, or NiceIce - names that came up in the course of this thread. They are a fairly well known online vendor but not a regular contributor to this forum. Brand X was not Infinity, EightStar, SuperbCert, or ACA. I haven't verified the particular claim with Brand X because it is no longer a stone that I'm interested in for other reasons. I agree it is a good idea to confirm with the cutter. But I will make one more clarification here. The claim "same cutter as produces Brand X" was not made unsolicited by Anonymous Vendor as part of their sales pitch. It was made in response to my direct question to them: "Who cut this stone?". Perhaps they could have said Cutter # in Antwerp, and it probably wouldn't have meant anything to me (though I would have googled them), so they answered the way they did. Or maybe it was just meant to impress me. But I suspect I'm not alone in being curious about these things, since this information is not presented openly. I'm glad that others see good things coming out of this thread, and that forum "heavyweights" have made contributions. aloha |
| Posted: 6/21/2007 3:41:13 PM | |
| P: 6/21/2007 3:47:19 PM | |
|
Wink Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,032 Last Post: 11/17/2009 Member Since: 5/4/2001 |
Heavyweight, who you calling heavyweight? Sure, I could use a loss of a few pounds, but to be publically ridiculed???![]() Wink Wink Jones |
| Posted: 6/21/2007 3:47:19 PM | |
| P: 6/21/2007 3:55:34 PM | |
|
WorkingHardforSmallRewards Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,234 Last Post: 12/14/2008 Member Since: 6/6/2007 |
I have to say on understanding the process a little better it has a two fold affect. One being more respect for the slight premium for some of the name brands, in particular after learning how WF diamonds are selected, it not only add the assurity of excellent performance but also adds a somewhat more romantic element to the diamond. But on the other hand it really emphasises the idea that the cut and light performance is what is important, not the brand name--which I already understood. Also, what I meant when I said that I don't really care about the cutter was that I would not consider less of a masterfully cut diamond for the sake of a "brand name,", or more specifically that I don't care who a cutter works for or what name his merchandise carries, but rather about the ability he has and the product he has produced. And for a funny analogy: I have never been much of a "Tommy hillfiger" kind of guy--I mostly just look for solid, well made, good looking reliable pants. But at the same time, if Tommy were to personally try on and inspect each pair of pants before putting them out with his brand name. Well then...I might be interested in owning a pair (if I could get over the disgusting element present in the pants issue). ____________________________ |
| Posted: 6/21/2007 3:55:34 PM | |
|
|
Pages: 1 of 2: [1] 2 > |
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives