![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Convert percentages to angles??? |
![]() |
| P: 4/24/2003 5:16:07 PM | |
hunter3316 Rough Rock Total Posts: 30 Last Post: 8/27/2003 Member Since: 4/1/2003 |
Can anyone tell me how to convert crown and pav. percentages to angles... assuming no cullet. I want to do it for these two diamonds: 1: Depth:61.3% Table; 56% Crown: 14% Pavilian: 43% 2: Depth:59.9% Table;58% Crown:14% Pavilian:43% thanks for your great help!!!!
NOne |
| Posted: 4/24/2003 5:16:07 PM | |
![]() |
There are 7 replies to this message. There are 7 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 4/24/2003 5:32:02 PM | |
|
Pricescope Administrator Total Posts: 8,265 Last Post: 1/5/2008 Member Since: 1/1/2000 |
Did you get the data from EGL report? If they are rounded there will be rather high error in HCA. You can use these formulas to convert % to angles without culet: CrownAngle = ATAN (2 * CrownDepth% / (100 - TableSize)) PavilionAngle = ATAN (PavilionDepth% / 50) Pricescope |
| Posted: 4/24/2003 5:32:02 PM | |
| P: 4/24/2003 5:47:32 PM | |
|
MikeC Rough Rock Total Posts: 17 Last Post: 4/25/2003 Member Since: 4/3/2003 |
I was wondering how to do this as well. leonid, Thanks for the equation, but what does ATAN stand for? Mike
|
| Posted: 4/24/2003 5:47:32 PM | |
| P: 4/24/2003 5:58:40 PM | |
|
Pricescope Administrator Total Posts: 8,265 Last Post: 1/5/2008 Member Since: 1/1/2000 |
----------------Mike, ATAN (Arctangent) is reciprocal to TAN (Tangent) On Windows' Calculator (Scientific Mode) select INV and hit TAN.
Pricescope |
| Posted: 4/24/2003 5:58:40 PM | |
| P: 4/24/2003 6:03:34 PM | |
hunter3316 Rough Rock Total Posts: 30 Last Post: 8/27/2003 Member Since: 4/1/2003 |
Thanks, thats exactly what I was lookin for. To answer your question YES, these numbers are from EGL. How much of an eror could I expect, according HIC scoring. I supose theres no other way to fix this except to do the SERIN hu? Also whats the average error for converting EGL %'s to HIC scores? Thanks! NOne |
| Posted: 4/24/2003 6:03:34 PM | |
| P: 4/24/2003 6:15:04 PM | |
|
MikeC Rough Rock Total Posts: 17 Last Post: 4/25/2003 Member Since: 4/3/2003 |
Thanks leonid. Originally I just had the pav. percentage and got a score of 1 on the HCA but was not to sure how reliable that was because it was a percentage and not an angle. After doing the conversion my score actually went down to .9. That made my day
|
| Posted: 4/24/2003 6:15:04 PM | |
| P: 4/24/2003 8:48:42 PM | |
|
Pricescope Administrator Total Posts: 8,265 Last Post: 1/5/2008 Member Since: 1/1/2000 |
hunter3316: ----------------Correct... ----------------It depends on particular values. I just tried to plug pavilion depth of 43.0% and 43.5%. In both cases I've got HCA < 2 which is pretty good. However, there will be more dramatic difference once you go closer to 43.8%-44.0% pavilion depth since diamond will leak more light under the table. Pricescope |
| Posted: 4/24/2003 8:48:42 PM | |
| P: 4/24/2003 8:56:25 PM | |
|
Pricescope Administrator Total Posts: 8,265 Last Post: 1/5/2008 Member Since: 1/1/2000 |
Mike, actually when one enters pavilion or crown depth %, HCA converts it into angles anyway because HCA is based on angles. We believe Sarin angle data are more accurate than depth% because later depends on accuracy of girdle and culet measurements. Still, even angles data have certain error so don't fight for each tenth of HCA score
Pricescope |
| Posted: 4/24/2003 8:56:25 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives