adiamor.com/
 

Diamond Jewelry Forums   Picture Gallery   Video Gallery   Journal

   
 Search Posted Today Most Active Help   
 » Home »  » Diamond Prices and Grading »  » RockyTalky »  » .85 vs 1.1


  

 .85 vs 1.1

P:  3/29/2007 12:59:42 PM  
skarim
skarim

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 4
Last Post: 3/30/2007
Member Since: 5/14/2004
 
Hi,

I know this question is going to come down to a matter of personal taste and budget, but thought would get ideas anyway.

I was about to order a 1.1 c RB from a PS vendor , but then reconsidered, wondering about a 0.84 C diamond from the same vendor.

Both diamonds are G, VS1, AGS000, with HCA scores of 1.1 to 1.4, premium branded.

There is a $1700 difference between the two, which I'm wondering is really worth it for a difference of 0.5 mm diameter, that will then be mounted in a pt solitaire. Is the larger one going to look nearly $2000 nicer? Subjective question, I know. She is petite with 4.5 ring size, with friends who probably have ~1 C stones.

Thoughts appreciated.


Posted:  3/29/2007 12:59:42 PM

 There are 14 replies to this message.  There are 14 replies on this page.

P: 3/29/2007 1:05:28 PM
neatfreak
neatfreak

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 13,450
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 2/17/2007
 
It really depends on if she is size obsessed or not. All other things being equal, if she has not expressed her desire for a bigger stone, I would save the $ and put it toward the wedding. But that is just me...

It is important for many women to have over 1 ct. So if your GF is one of them, spring for the bigger stone. Otherwise, only YOU can know whether you can afford the bigger one or not.

Posted:  3/29/2007 1:05:28 PM
P: 3/29/2007 1:05:38 PM
Moosejaw
Moosejaw

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 227
Last Post: 12/11/2008
Member Since: 5/14/2003
 
Get the larger stone. It will possibly prevent her from wanting to upgrade, and she can tell her friends its 1 carat. Its worth it. Is it REALLY worth it financially, and short term? No. So I feel your pain, but get the larger better stone.

-G

Posted:  3/29/2007 1:05:38 PM
P: 3/29/2007 1:13:03 PM
NYCsparkle
NYCsparkle

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,278
Last Post: 11/21/2009
Member Since: 7/23/2006
 
go for the 1.1.  shrinkage sets in---and fast...lol

Posted:  3/29/2007 1:13:03 PM
P: 3/29/2007 1:20:59 PM
kellyfish
kellyfish

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 665
Last Post: 1/26/2009
Member Since: 3/1/2007
 
If you can afford it, go with the larger!! I am not typically materialistic, but my dh chose a lovely, .78/vs1/g when we were engaged. I requested either wh gold or platinum. He chose a platinum setting with small sidestones. I thought the ring was very pretty and I know he was going for quality, but I remember thinking that I would have been more happy with a simple, wh gold setting- h color-vs2-quality and a 1+ carat. I WOULD HAVE NEVER SAID THAT THOUGH!!! 

Get the 1ct baby if you can!!    

Kelly C.

Posted:  3/29/2007 1:20:59 PM
P: 3/29/2007 1:32:05 PM
Beacon
Beacon

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,734
Last Post: 11/9/2009
Member Since: 7/14/2006
 
Larger, for sure.

Sounds like you have picked out some nice stones.

Half a millimeter is quite a big difference in this stone size.  One would certainly notice it.

Posted:  3/29/2007 1:32:05 PM
P: 3/29/2007 1:36:10 PM
sharry
sharry

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 62
Last Post: 4/18/2007
Member Since: 2/24/2007
 
Definately the 1.1! I've just gotton my 2.2 RB 2 weeks ago, and already it's beginning to look small

Posted:  3/29/2007 1:36:10 PM
P: 3/29/2007 1:40:40 PM
Kaleigh
Kaleigh

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 25,905
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 11/18/2004
 
I'd go for the larger one as well, if you can swing it.  And she'll appreciate the size down the road.  

____________________________
Piece of cake and a candle.
**ng gift**

Posted:  3/29/2007 1:40:40 PM
P: 3/29/2007 2:02:49 PM
Kelkel
Kelkel

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 31
Last Post: 6/14/2007
Member Since: 2/8/2007
 
I'd say go with the 1.1 too. In fact, if you want to save money, try H, VS2 but still stick with 1 carat or above. I bought my girlfriend/fiancee a 1.04ct round (my only diamond purchase in life) and it doesn't appear big on her size 4.25 finger. I'm really glad I didn't "play it safe" and went with Tiffany, because that would mean a .76ct for her, given the same budget.

Posted:  3/29/2007 2:02:49 PM
P: 3/29/2007 2:54:41 PM
vespergirl
vespergirl

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 3,916
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 1/29/2007
 
Definitely go for the 1.1.  Trust me, she'll want to tell people that it's a carat, instead of under a carat.  PLus, you will definitely notice a size difference.  If you go to a mall a lot of the mass-market jewelry stores have rings lined up according to size in their cases - .25, .50, .75, 1.0 carat.  You will see a big difference in the sizes, even in just a 1/4 carat difference once mounted.

Posted:  3/29/2007 2:54:41 PM
P: 3/29/2007 7:27:46 PM
risingsun
risingsun

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 3,414
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 12/19/2006
 
Live large  I was in your gf's situation and would have chosen >1ct--had I been asked.  Now that I've upgraded, I'm a happy camper

~Marian


______________________________________
"It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that bling..."

Posted:  3/29/2007 7:27:46 PM
P: 3/29/2007 8:14:34 PM
AdaBeta27
AdaBeta27

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 246
Last Post: 9/8/2007
Member Since: 9/7/2004
 
Go for one that has 6.5mm (1ct) or even one closer to 6.8mm or 7mm (premium cut 1.12 to ideal cut 1.25 ct.) if you can swing that.

I have worn 6mm, 6.5mm, and 7mm diameter, all G or H.  I usually can't tell the difference between G and H unless I turn them upside down and do a side by side comparison.  I'd be just as happy with VS2 as VS1, and I probably can't tell the difference between them most of the time. 

However, diameter (=area) gets noticed more than color.  The 6mm (.75 to .8ct) looks large at first, but after you wear it a while, you get so that you can immediately see a difference between 3/4 ct and 1 ct size and you start liking 1 cts stones more.  (I don't have the 6mm stone anymore.)  I mounted my 6mm in a boxy illusion head and then I was completely happy with it but I gave it back to my ex when we separated.  The 6.8 or 7mm diameter is really impressive, maybe 10% more cost.  People notice it's larger that 1 ct but it's a really wearable size.

Posted:  3/29/2007 8:14:34 PM
P: 3/29/2007 9:41:37 PM
SBee
SBee

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 71
Last Post: 4/24/2009
Member Since: 3/25/2007
 
Going against the grain here...

I don't personally care for stones bigger than 1 carat and actually prefer them to be a bit smaller (3/4's area)...(hmmm not that I'd turn down something bigger, mind you!)

I have large hands (ring size 6.5) and proportionately speaking, I think about .90 LOOKS best on my finger...but I'm not the least bit flashy in my appearance, and prefer to keeps things a little modest. Also, just the nature of my day to day activities (I'm often in rough spots in town) make me weary of wearing anything remotely big. That being said, I do really like my D's and VS1+'s hehe...

But yeah, as people have noted already in this thread, it all depends on the personality of YOUR lady. Most of my friends have diamonds that are much smaller than 1.00c, and I can't see any of them ever deciding to upgrade, but I definitely have a few other pals that insist on having 1.00c+ and are obviously (unfortunately) displeased with their partner's choice of rock.

Good luck with whatever you decide!!!

Posted:  3/29/2007 9:41:37 PM
P: 3/29/2007 10:23:54 PM
thing2of2
thing2of2

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 7,661
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 1/1/2007
 
Go for the 1.1 ct without a doubt. If budget is an issue, I agree with Kelkel-I think you could safely go for an eyeclean H/SI1, especially in an AGS 000 ideal cut stone.

It will look great on her (a 1.1 will not look too large on a size 4.5, I promise) and she'll be able to tell her friends it's over a carat!

Posted:  3/29/2007 10:23:54 PM
P: 3/30/2007 3:13:47 PM
skarim
skarim

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 4
Last Post: 3/30/2007
Member Since: 5/14/2004
 
Thanks for the thoughts.
You're a bunch of budget busters!

Posted:  3/30/2007 3:13:47 PM

 Previous Page Next Page 
« OMG!!! «» Anyone have any information Birks and their certifications? »
Next Topics
Eternity band stone size? Markup of family-owned jewelers vs. online??? What is fishtail pave setting? Any favorite Bay Area jewelers? Help me help my friend with an e-ring purchase Help: are these diamonds worth its value? Best brilliance for the buck... Great idea/product for those proposing with Diamond only (no ring) ... Opinion: Inclusions on the bottom of a stone Rolex Crystal Replaced How often does diamond and AGS report not match? My Jeweller says 3 prong tennis bracelets are not SAFE! Does anyone have this WF eternity band... ASET reading help Need advice on buying a heart shaped diamond pendant OMG!!! best mm size for size 8 ring Diamond Shape Re -appraisal of larger stones Anyone have any information Birks and their certifications? Calling all experts. Please find me... How is this possible??? Has anyone heard of or used J.Albrecht Fine Jewelry? Looking for diamond hoops! Help Selecting Princess Cut Diamond Finding an Asscher Cut, bluenile, jamesallen, ect. Please help choose between these two diamonds sizing ball just popped off - Grrr Help Finding This Setting Walmart Diamond Ring...Recommend? A little help...Searching for a princess Setting Help

Jump to:



Contact Us  |  Back Home  |  Privacy Statement  |  Forum Agreement  |  Forum Policies

Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 Message forum software powered by  the Ideal BB

IdealBB Badge


Pricescope - Knowledge - Diamond Prices - Tools - Resources - About

© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives