|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » RockyTalky
»  » Please help me decide which is better
|
|
 |
Please help me decide which is better |
 |
| P: 3/28/2007 5:51:54 PM | |
jstandra Rough Rock Total Posts: 6 Last Post: 3/28/2007 Member Since: 11/29/2006 |
Please help me choose between these 2 diamonds First diamond: GIA Round Brilliant 6.53-6.55 X 3.94 mm 1.02 carat E color VVS2 clarity excellent cut grade excellent polish & symmetry Fluorecense: None Griddle: Medium (Faceted) Price: $10,500 Second diamond: AGS Round Diamond 6.6-6.65 X 4.03 mm 1.07 carat E color VVS2 clarity Ideal cut grade Ideal polish & symmetry Fluorecense: Neglible Price: $9,970 Both diamonds score 0.9 at HCA Both diamonds are not from the same vendor. Please let me know how do you think which one I should choose. Thank you very much for your help |
| Posted: 3/28/2007 5:51:54 PM | |
|
There are 7 replies to this message. There are 7 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 3/28/2007 5:53:00 PM | |
JulieN Ideal Rock Total Posts: 7,145 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 7/25/2005 |
second diamond is bigger and cheaper.
|
| Posted: 3/28/2007 5:53:00 PM | |
| P: 3/28/2007 5:56:14 PM | |
|
jstandra Rough Rock Total Posts: 6 Last Post: 3/28/2007 Member Since: 11/29/2006 |
that is what I'm thinking as well but the 2nd diamond has neglible fluorecense which mean that it has slightly blue color if I'm not mistaken
|
| Posted: 3/28/2007 5:56:14 PM | |
| P: 3/28/2007 5:56:52 PM | |
|
JulieN Ideal Rock Total Posts: 7,145 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 7/25/2005 |
GIA none and AGS negligible are equivalent.
|
| Posted: 3/28/2007 5:56:52 PM | |
| P: 3/28/2007 6:49:00 PM | |
|
jstandra Rough Rock Total Posts: 6 Last Post: 3/28/2007 Member Since: 11/29/2006 |
Thank you for the information, more opinions would be very appreciated
|
| Posted: 3/28/2007 6:49:00 PM | |
| P: 3/28/2007 7:40:02 PM | |
bosoxbw Rough Rock Total Posts: 69 Last Post: 5/10/2007 Member Since: 12/14/2006 |
Based on the numbers and prices you provided, I would pick #2. However, why so high on color/clarity? You could drop at least to an F/VS2 without any noticeable difference, and either get a bigger stone or spend some money.
|
| Posted: 3/28/2007 7:40:02 PM | |
| P: 3/28/2007 8:44:25 PM | |
|
jstandra Rough Rock Total Posts: 6 Last Post: 3/28/2007 Member Since: 11/29/2006 |
Thank you for the suggestions, I'll do some research further whether it'll be better to go bigger but lower quality or go with the way it is right now.
|
| Posted: 3/28/2007 8:44:25 PM | |
| P: 3/28/2007 8:45:34 PM | |
diamondseeker2006 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 17,609 Last Post: 11/18/2009 Member Since: 1/11/2006 |
Even if it had medium florescence, you probably wouldn't see it unless you put the diamond under a black light. Bu as someone said, negligible bascially means none so it is not an issue. I'd choose the second one assuming the girdle is in the range of thin-medium-slightly thick.
|
| Posted: 3/28/2007 8:45:34 PM | |
 Previous Page
|
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
