Engagement Rings Direct
 

Diamond Jewelry Forums   Picture Gallery   Video Gallery   Journal

   
 Search Posted Today Most Active Help   
 » Home »  » Diamond Prices and Grading »  » RockyTalky »  » Narrowed Down the Choices


  

 Narrowed Down the Choices

P:  3/6/2007 2:28:03 PM  
mcwhipp
mcwhipp

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 19
Last Post: 5/2/2007
Member Since: 1/29/2007
 
I have lurked for awhile and appreciate everyone's willness to help and provide constructive critiques. So please help me "seal the deal" by choosing the right diamond.

Ok - I am down to James Allen or GOG and down to three princess diamonds. I welcome any comments or concerns about the attached information. I am looking for best sparkle/performing diamond. Your opinions are welcomed and appreciated.

GOG
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/2036/
Carat Weight: 0.945ct
Color: F
Clarity: VS1
GIA Cut Grade: NA
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Fluorescence: Negligible
Girdle: 2.14%
Lab Report: AGS
Lab Report #: 7120009
In House: Yes
Width: 5.33mm
Length: 5.32mm
Depth: 4.11mm
Table Percentage: 60.44%
Depth Percentage: 77.17%
Crown Depth: 11.11%
Pavilion Depth: 63.40%

James Allen #1
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?find=1&cid=130&item=952132
Item Number: 952132
Shape: Princess
Carat weight: 0.95
Cut: Premium
Color: D
Clarity: VVS1
Certificate: GIA
 
Depth: 71.8%
Table: 73%
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Very Good
Girdle: Thin to slightly thick
Culet: None
Fluorescence: STRNG BL
Measurements: 5.31*5.47*3.80
Ratio: 1.03

James Allen #2
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?find=1&cid=130&item=1021941
Item Number: 1021941
Shape: Princess
Carat weight: 0.90
Cut: Premium
Color: E
Clarity: VVS2
Certificate: GIA
 
Depth: 72.4%
Table: 73%
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Girdle: Slightly thick to thick
Culet: None
Fluorescence: None
Measurements: 5.49*5.4*3.91
Ratio: 1.02


At worst I would like to narrow down to two. Thanks for all your help.

Posted:  3/6/2007 2:28:03 PM

 There are 13 replies to this message.  There are 13 replies on this page.

P: 3/6/2007 3:37:57 PM
JulieN
JulieN

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 7,150
Last Post: 11/25/2009
Member Since: 7/25/2005
 
GOG one says sold?

1st JA: not really digging the dark center...but it's a common place for low angle light, not obstruction, so if you really want  D VVS1 with strong blue fluor, get an Ideal Scope pic
2nd doesn't have a pic

Posted:  3/6/2007 3:37:57 PM
P: 3/6/2007 3:40:26 PM
Regular Guy
Regular Guy

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 5,327
Last Post: 11/24/2009
Member Since: 7/7/2004
 
Hopefully that's you who's purchased the GOG option.  I would favor it anyway, particularly for its certificate, and for getting what you need on color & clarity.

Ira (Ruffles have Ridges) Z.
____________

If you're looking for diamond shopping tips...this (along with this update) might do the trick!

however...caution: known to have been regarded as armed and dangerous…

Posted:  3/6/2007 3:40:26 PM
P: 3/6/2007 4:02:44 PM
mcwhipp
mcwhipp

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 19
Last Post: 5/2/2007
Member Since: 1/29/2007
 
No unfortunately it was not me, it showed it was available when I posted this morning. Well looks like I am down to 2.

Posted:  3/6/2007 4:02:44 PM
P: 3/6/2007 4:16:37 PM
JulieN
JulieN

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 7,150
Last Post: 11/25/2009
Member Since: 7/25/2005
 
I have some preference for the pictures of these stones:
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?b=16&a=12&c=77&cid=131&item=860599
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?b=16&a=12&c=77&cid=131&item=860630

Posted:  3/6/2007 4:16:37 PM
P: 3/6/2007 4:32:58 PM
mcwhipp
mcwhipp

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 19
Last Post: 5/2/2007
Member Since: 1/29/2007
 
Julie - do you see the polish and symmetry only having a good rating as a problem for your 2nd recommendation?

Posted:  3/6/2007 4:32:58 PM
P: 3/6/2007 6:40:45 PM
JulieN
JulieN

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 7,150
Last Post: 11/25/2009
Member Since: 7/25/2005
 
It is inherently more difficult to get excellent marks on finish for fancies.

As long as the deductions for polish and symmetry are not visible to the naked eye, it doesn't matter.

I'm more interested in the Ideal Scope pictures, and maybe ASET if possible, than the finish marks.

I'm assuming you're looking D-F, IF-VS2, <5500?

Posted:  3/6/2007 6:40:45 PM
P: 3/6/2007 6:41:40 PM
mcwhipp
mcwhipp

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 19
Last Post: 5/2/2007
Member Since: 1/29/2007
 
Tim at GOG gave me another option that I am leaning towards. http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/2393/
Any opinions on this one?

Posted:  3/6/2007 6:41:40 PM
P: 3/6/2007 6:44:32 PM
JulieN
JulieN

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 7,150
Last Post: 11/25/2009
Member Since: 7/25/2005
 
It has the bold look characteristic of 2 chevron AGS PR.

I don't think it's a suitable replacement, though, in terms of size difference.

Once you're open to G, that opens up a whole new world of possibilities.

Posted:  3/6/2007 6:44:32 PM
P: 3/6/2007 6:49:28 PM
mcwhipp
mcwhipp

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 19
Last Post: 5/2/2007
Member Since: 1/29/2007
 
I am open to G. I would say D-G, VS2 is my limit on clarity. I really want the best fire and sparkle. I could care less if that meant a tenth of a carat less when comparing 2 diamonds

Posted:  3/6/2007 6:49:28 PM
P: 3/6/2007 6:50:31 PM
JulieN
JulieN

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 7,150
Last Post: 11/25/2009
Member Since: 7/25/2005
 
budget?

The G looks nice.

Posted:  3/6/2007 6:50:31 PM
P: 3/6/2007 6:50:45 PM
mcwhipp
mcwhipp

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 19
Last Post: 5/2/2007
Member Since: 1/29/2007
 
I am open to G. I would say D-G, VS2 is my limit on clarity. I really want the best fire and sparkle and if I got the best in terms of sparkle and fire then I could care less if that meant a tenth of a carat less when comparing 2 diamonds

Posted:  3/6/2007 6:50:45 PM
P: 3/6/2007 6:56:05 PM
JulieN
JulieN

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 7,150
Last Post: 11/25/2009
Member Since: 7/25/2005
 
I guess one tenth of a carat doesn't seem like that much.

Princesses have less face up surface area than rounds.  While some may speak of optical illusions where two stones of equal weight, one RB and one PR, /seem/ to look the same, the .8 G has the same face-up surface area as a Tolk round of about 3/4 carat.

Posted:  3/6/2007 6:56:05 PM
P: 3/6/2007 6:57:43 PM
mcwhipp
mcwhipp

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 19
Last Post: 5/2/2007
Member Since: 1/29/2007
 
Around $5500 for diamond. Will be in platinum solitaire setting with some side engraving most likely.

Posted:  3/6/2007 6:57:43 PM

 Previous Page Next Page 
« Emerald Cut Experts - I need your assistance, please! «» Questions on purchasing a round diamond »
Next Topics
safety of a bar set diamond in an eternity ring? Newbie Question Mark Morrell Flame (w/ or w/o accent diamonds) What do you think of these stones? Total confusion with these H&A stones Getting closer... some opinions please Polish: Excellent or V Good --- big deal? H&A laser inscription...does it mean it's a true H&A? Any photoshop pros out there? diamond specs... %ages are ok, right? i have a specific look Yellow gold or White Metals??? Ring Re-set 1.27 G vs 1.54 H Princess Ideal Cut ... I'm torn between two settings for a cushion....please help me decide Is pave trendy? Ebay help, I've been offered 2nd chance, but need some advice The Big Buy - Help! Where to find something similar to Tiffany's Novo Which diamond is better? My Engagement Ring Buying Experience what does this IS image mean? is it good? Good Old Gold - another happy customer Amorique or Something Like It?! Opinions on Princess Idealscope opinions please-about to buy! Opinions on this stone... please don't hold back Are James Allen Jewelers Practices Legitimate? Advice on this diamond..How can GIA grade this as an EXCELLENT cut?/ my diamond quest continues Another ebay question

Jump to:



Contact Us  |  Back Home  |  Privacy Statement  |  Forum Agreement  |  Forum Policies

Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 Message forum software powered by  the Ideal BB

IdealBB Badge


Pricescope - Knowledge - Diamond Prices - Tools - Resources - About

© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives