![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Question about prices of different shapes |
![]() |
| P: 1/27/2007 6:06:37 PM | |
|
candlelite80 Cut Rock Total Posts: 144 Last Post: 4/2/2008 Member Since: 1/16/2007 |
Just wondering what shaoe (round, princess, emerald, etc) is considered to be the most affordable (aka cheapest) ... which is the most expensive??? Thanks!
|
| Posted: 1/27/2007 6:06:37 PM | |
![]() |
There are 5 replies to this message. There are 5 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 1/27/2007 6:08:01 PM | |
|
kcoursolle Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,344 Last Post: 10/14/2009 Member Since: 1/21/2006 |
Rounds are slightly more expensive than the other fancy shapes mentioned, but they face up larger...so it almost evens out. Emerald shapes usually require higher clarity because they show inclusions more than the other shapes.
|
| Posted: 1/27/2007 6:08:01 PM | |
| P: 1/27/2007 6:12:34 PM | |
|
candlelite80 Cut Rock Total Posts: 144 Last Post: 4/2/2008 Member Since: 1/16/2007 |
Where do the other fancy shapes fall??? Specifically, princess cuts.
|
| Posted: 1/27/2007 6:12:34 PM | |
| P: 1/27/2007 6:26:24 PM | |
|
kcoursolle Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,344 Last Post: 10/14/2009 Member Since: 1/21/2006 |
Date: 1/27/2007 6:12:34 PM Author: candlelite80 Where do the other fancy shapes fall??? Specifically, princess cuts. Princesses are also slightly cheaper than rounds, but face up smaller. Pears and marquise are cheaper and sometimes face up larger than rounds.
|
| Posted: 1/27/2007 6:26:24 PM | |
| P: 1/27/2007 6:26:55 PM | |
JulieN Ideal Rock Total Posts: 7,148 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 7/25/2005 |
Ran two searches on PS: Round shape, H & A, 1.2–1.3 cts, D–H color, IF–SI1 clarity, 58.7–62.3% depth, 53–58% table, $1000–99999, AGS certified Princess shape, 1.2–1.3 cts, D–H color, IF–SI1 clarity, 56–76% depth, 57–83% table, $1000–99999, AGS certified I will list the princess first. 1.21 G VS1 75% 66.74% AGS 2.58 id id ng 5.94x5.77x4.32 1.03 -14% $8503 1.208 G VS1 60.7% 55% AGS tn-sl.tk f id id n 6.91x6.93x4.20 1% $9781 1.24 H SI1 74.3% 71% AGS md id id n 5.77x5.76x4.28 1.00 -22% $5691 1.254 H SI1 61.9% 56% AGS tn-md f id id n 6.90x6.92x4.28 -3% $7243 1.246 G VVS1 75.3% 69% AGS tn-md id id n 5.86x5.75x4.30 1.02 -20% $8683 1.243 G VVS1 60.5% 56% AGS tn-md-f id id n 6.97x7.01x4.24 1% $11578 1.262 G VS1 75.7% 69.28% AGS 2.08 id id ng 6.02x5.82x4.40 1.03 -14% $8675 1.26 G VS1 62% 56% AGS tn-md f id id n 6.90x6.94x4.28 -3% $10270
|
| Posted: 1/27/2007 6:26:55 PM | |
| P: 1/27/2007 9:27:51 PM | |
|
candlelite80 Cut Rock Total Posts: 144 Last Post: 4/2/2008 Member Since: 1/16/2007 |
Thank you for the info. and the comparison, it helps me visualize!
|
| Posted: 1/27/2007 9:27:51 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives