![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
What if the Sarin report varies from the GIA report? |
![]() |
| P: 1/8/2007 4:07:46 PM | |
jimmerson Rough Rock Total Posts: 10 Last Post: 1/26/2007 Member Since: 1/3/2007 |
Dealing with a Daniel K square-emerald, and the GIA report says Ex-Ex. I requested a Sarin report and it came back VG VG. What gives, and how should I respond (i.e., reject outright, ask for price reduction, etc.)?
|
| Posted: 1/8/2007 4:07:46 PM | |
![]() |
There are 2 replies to this message. There are 2 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 1/8/2007 4:51:56 PM | |
|
oldminer Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,964 Last Post: 11/20/2009 Member Since: 9/4/2000 |
A Sarin does not actually grade Polish or Symmetry like a lab might do. It has built in software to look at parameters and it does offer that opinion of cut quality, but no one regards this result as anything important. Sarin machines do not all agree perfectly with eachother, but for their purpose, they are "accurate enough" and pose little problem because they don't all work identically. Close with a shot gun is good enough. A few hundredths off with different Sarins is not a problem, either.
David S. Atlas |
| Posted: 1/8/2007 4:51:56 PM | |
| P: 1/8/2007 6:33:56 PM | |
|
Rhino Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,865 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 3/29/2001 |
I'd ditto Dave and add one thing. The Sarin actually does attempt to grade symmetry based on the deviations in the facet measurements. The highest grade it will give a diamond is "Very Good" and doesn't use "Excellent" in its nomenclature so you're fine in that regards. All the best, Rhino |
| Posted: 1/8/2007 6:33:56 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives